Cohn Melvin
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Conceptual Immunology Group, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Immunol Res. 2005;31(2):133-50. doi: 10.1385/IR:31:2:133.
An effective immune response to an antigen requires two sets of decisions: Decision 1, the sorting of the repertoire, and Decision 2, the regulation of effector class. The repertoire, because it is somatically generated, large, and random, must be sorted by a somatic mechanism that subtracts those specificities (anti-self) that, if expressed, would debilitate the host, leaving a residue (anti-nonself) that, if not expressed, would result in the death of the host by infection. The self-nonself discrimination is the metaphor used to describe Decision 1, the sorting of the repertoire. In order to be functional, the sorted repertoire must be coupled to a set of biodestructive and ridding effector functions, such that the response to each antigen is treated in a coherent and independent manner. Although a reasonably complete framework for Decision 1 exists, Decision 2 lacks conceptualization. The questions that must be considered to arrive at a proper framework are posed. It should be emphasized that manipulation at the level of Decision 2 is where clinical applications are likely to be found.
决定1,即对抗原库进行筛选;决定2,即对效应器类别进行调控。抗原库由于是体细胞产生的、庞大且随机的,必须通过一种体细胞机制进行筛选,去除那些如果表达就会损害宿主的特异性(抗自身),留下一个残余部分(抗非自身),如果不表达,宿主就会因感染而死亡。自身与非自身的区分是用来描述决定1(对抗原库的筛选)的比喻。为了发挥功能,经过筛选的抗原库必须与一组生物破坏性和清除性效应功能相耦合,以便对每种抗原的反应都能以连贯且独立的方式进行处理。虽然决定1已经有了一个相当完整的框架,但决定2仍缺乏概念化。文中提出了为得出一个恰当框架必须考虑的问题。应该强调的是,在决定2层面进行操控很可能会找到临床应用。