van der Heijde D, Braun J, McGonagle D, Siegel J
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii24-32. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.suppl_3.iii24.
Emerging treatment options in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are giving new hope to patients with this chronic and potentially disabling disease. Clinical development of new treatments requires that rigorous and well controlled trials be conducted to demonstrate safety and efficacy. A number of classification systems have been developed in recent years as a result of enhanced understanding of the pathogenesis of AS. Although new outcome measures have been developed and a consensus has been reached on the use of assessment instruments in clinical trials, there is still need for improvement and implementation. The ASsessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) Working Group has addressed some of these dilemmas by establishing a core set of domains for the evaluation of AS and by selecting specific assessment methods for each domain. They have also published improvement criteria for assessing short term improvement with symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs and are presently in the process of developing response criteria for disease controlling antirheumatic treatment. Various experts are also currently examining discrepancies and inadequacies of classification systems for AS. Imaging studies, magnetic resonance imaging, in particular, may provide better classification criteria in the near future. In addition to consensus on outcome assessment and classification of AS, lessons learnt from clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may serve as a template for AS. Guidance provided by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical trials in RA may be of particular use. The FDA has defined the claims that sponsors can receive for RA products and the clinical trial data that would be expected to be submitted to support such claims.
强直性脊柱炎(AS)新兴的治疗选择为患有这种慢性且可能致残疾病的患者带来了新希望。新疗法的临床开发需要进行严格且控制良好的试验以证明安全性和有效性。近年来,由于对AS发病机制的深入了解,已经开发了一些分类系统。尽管已经开发了新的疗效指标,并且在临床试验中评估工具的使用上已达成共识,但仍有改进和实施的必要。强直性脊柱炎评估(ASAS)工作组通过建立一套核心领域来评估AS,并为每个领域选择特定的评估方法,解决了其中一些难题。他们还发布了评估使用改善症状抗风湿药物后的短期改善情况的标准,目前正在制定疾病控制抗风湿治疗的反应标准。目前,各位专家也在研究AS分类系统中存在的差异和不足之处。尤其是磁共振成像等影像学研究,可能在不久的将来提供更好的分类标准。除了在AS的疗效评估和分类方面达成共识外,类风湿关节炎(RA)临床试验的经验教训也可为AS提供借鉴。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)为RA临床试验提供的指导可能特别有用。FDA已经明确了申办者可以为RA产品获得的批准声明以及预计将提交以支持此类声明的临床试验数据。