Suppr超能文献

院前补液在低血压性钝性创伤患者中的应用。

Use of prehospital fluids in hypotensive blunt trauma patients.

作者信息

Dula David J, Wood G Craig, Rejmer Abbey R, Starr Michael, Leicht Michael

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):417-20. doi: 10.1080/10903120290938058.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of blunt trauma victims with systolic blood pressure < or = 90 mm Hg who received prehospital fluids with the outcomes of those who did not receive prehospital fluids.

METHODS

This matched-pairs case-control study used records of blunt trauma patients with scene systolic blood pressure < or = 90 mm Hg obtained from the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation. Patients who received > 500 mL prehospital fluids (n = 75) were matched by Injury Severity Score (ISS) and systolic blood pressure on scene with those who did not receive any prehospital fluids (n = 75). Outcomes compared included change in systolic blood pressure, survival to discharge, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Those who received fluids were more likely to have an increase in systolic blood pressure at arrival to the emergency department [odds ratio for fluid use = 2.41; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.02, 5.73; p = 0.046]. There was no significant difference in survival to discharge (odds ratio for fluid use = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.40, 2.60; p = 0.969). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay: 5.4 days (SD = 2.8) for those with fluids; 5.2 days (SD = 2.8) for those with no fluids; difference = 0.2 days; 95% CI = -1.6, 1.8; p = 0.870.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that prehospital fluid resuscitation of blunt injured trauma patients with systolic blood pressure < or = 90 increases systolic blood pressure but has no effect on survival or length of hospital stay.

摘要

目的

比较收缩压≤90mmHg的钝性创伤患者接受院前补液与未接受院前补液的治疗结果。

方法

这项配对病例对照研究使用了从宾夕法尼亚创伤系统基金会获得的收缩压≤90mmHg的钝性创伤患者记录。接受超过500mL院前补液的患者(n = 75),按照损伤严重度评分(ISS)和现场收缩压与未接受任何院前补液的患者(n = 75)进行匹配。比较的结果包括收缩压的变化、出院生存率和住院时间。

结果

接受补液的患者在到达急诊科时收缩压升高的可能性更大[补液使用的优势比=2.41;95%置信区间(95%CI)=1.02, 5.73;p = 0.046]。出院生存率无显著差异(补液使用的优势比=1.02;95%CI = 0.40, 2.60;p = 0.969)。住院时间无显著差异:接受补液的患者为5.4天(标准差=2.8);未接受补液的患者为5.2天(标准差=2.8);差异=0.2天;95%CI = -1.6, 1.8;p = 0.870。

结论

本研究表明,对收缩压≤90mmHg的钝性创伤患者进行院前液体复苏可提高收缩压,但对生存率或住院时间无影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验