Suppr超能文献

使用坚固内固定和多孔块状羟基磷灰石移植进行上颌前徙的稳定性:腭裂患者与非腭裂患者的比较

Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients.

作者信息

Mehra P, Wolford L M, Hopkin J K, Castro V, Frietas R

机构信息

Baylor College of Dentistry, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas,Texas, USA.

出版信息

Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Fall;16(3):193-9.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the stability of maxillary advancement using bone plates for skeletal stabilization and porous block hydroxyapatite (PBHA) as a bone graft substitute for interpositional grafting in cleft and non-cleft patients. The records of 74 patients (41 females, 33 males) who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and PBHA interpositional grafting were evaluated retrospectively. All patients also underwent simultaneous sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomies. Patients were divided into 2 groups for study purposes: group 1 consisted of 17 cleft palate patients and group 2 consisted of 57 non-cleft patients. Each group was further subdivided into 2 subgroups based on the concurrent vertical positioning of the maxillary incisors: groups 1a and 2a, where the maxilla underwent 3 mm or more of inferior repositioning, and groups 1b and 2b, where the maxilla underwent minimal vertical change (< or = 1 mm). Presurgery, immediate postsurgery, and longest follow-up lateral cephalometric tracings were superimposed and analyzed to calculate surgical change and long-term stability of results by assessing horizontal and vertical changes at point A, incisor superius, and the mesial cusp tip of maxillary first molar. The average follow-up time in group 1 was 37.9 months (range 12 to 136) and in group 2 was 28.77 months (range 17 to 88). Average maxillary advancement at point A was: group 1a, 5.4 mm; group 1b, 5.25 mm; group 2a, 5.48 mm; group 2b, 5.46 mm. Average relapse at point A was: group 1a, -0.75 mm; group 1b, -1 mm; group 2a, -0.47 mm; group 2b, -0.48 mm. Average horizontal and/or vertical relapse at the central incisors and first molars was 1 mm or less in group 1 and less than 0.5 mm in group 2. Although there was a slightly greater relapse in group 1, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Maxillary advancement with Le Fort 1 osteotomies using rigid fixation and interpositional PBHA grafting during bimaxillary surgery is a stable procedure with good predictability in cleft and non-cleft patients, regardless of the direction of vertical maxillary movement.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在腭裂患者和非腭裂患者中,使用骨板进行骨骼固定以及用多孔块状羟基磷灰石(PBHA)作为骨移植替代物进行间置移植时上颌前徙的稳定性。回顾性评估了74例患者(41例女性,33例男性)的记录,这些患者接受了使用坚固内固定和PBHA间置移植的Le Fort I型上颌前徙术。所有患者同时还接受了下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术。为研究目的,将患者分为2组:第1组由17例腭裂患者组成,第2组由57例非腭裂患者组成。根据上颌切牙的同期垂直定位,每组再进一步细分为2个亚组:1a组和2a组,上颌向下复位3 mm或更多;1b组和2b组,上颌垂直变化最小(≤1 mm)。将术前、术后即刻和最长随访时的头颅侧位片进行叠加分析,通过评估A点、上切牙和上颌第一磨牙近中尖的水平和垂直变化,计算手术变化和结果的长期稳定性。第1组的平均随访时间为37.9个月(范围12至136个月),第2组为28.77个月(范围17至88个月)。A点的平均上颌前徙量为:1a组5.4 mm;1b组5.25 mm;2a组5.48 mm;2b组5.46 mm。A点的平均复发量为:1a组-0.75 mm;1b组-1 mm;2a组-0.47 mm;2b组-0.48 mm。第1组中切牙和第一磨牙的平均水平和/或垂直复发量为1 mm或更少,第2组为小于0.5 mm。虽然第1组的复发略多,但两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。在双颌手术中,使用坚固内固定和间置PBHA移植的Le Fort I型截骨术进行上颌前徙,对于腭裂患者和非腭裂患者来说,无论上颌垂直移动方向如何,都是一种稳定且可预测性良好的手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验