文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

腭裂患者上颌骨牵引成骨术后的长期骨骼稳定性。

Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients.

机构信息

Orthodontic Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1115-22. doi: 10.2319/011212-27.1. Epub 2012 Apr 12.


DOI:10.2319/011212-27.1
PMID:22506512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8813140/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis (DO) in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases, grey literature, and reference list searches were conducted. The inclusion criteria were stability of maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis assessed at the posttreatment follow-up ≥ 1 year in CLP patients. Full articles were retrieved from abstracts or titles that appear to meet the inclusion criteria or lacked sufficient detail for immediate exclusion. Once full articles were collected, they were again reviewed considering more detailed inclusion criteria for a final selection decision. A methodologic quality assessment tool was utilized. RESULTS: Thirty abstracts/titles met the initial search criteria, and 13 articles were finally selected. Overall, methodologic quality scores were high in only one randomized clinical trial. After maxillary advancement with DO in CLP patients, the long-term horizontal relapse in A-point was less than 15% in eight studies and between 20% and 25% in four studies. The study that was judged as a high-quality study reported 8.2% horizontal relapse in A-point. The relapse rate was higher in DO with external distracter device than DO with internal distracter device. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests maxillary advancement with DO has good stability in CLP patients with moderate and severe maxillary hypoplasia.

摘要

目的:系统评价唇腭裂患者上颌骨牵引成骨术后的长期骨骼稳定性。

材料与方法:电子数据库、灰色文献和参考文献搜索。纳入标准为唇腭裂患者上颌骨牵引成骨术后,在治疗后随访≥1 年时评估上颌骨前徙的稳定性。从似乎符合纳入标准的摘要或标题中检索全文,或因缺乏即时排除的详细信息而检索全文。一旦收集到全文,将再次进行审查,以考虑更详细的纳入标准做出最终选择决定。使用了一种方法学质量评估工具。

结果:最初的搜索有 30 个摘要/标题符合标准,最终选择了 13 篇文章。总的来说,只有一项随机临床试验的方法学质量评分较高。在唇腭裂患者中进行上颌骨牵引成骨术后,8 项研究中 A 点的长期水平复发小于 15%,4 项研究中为 20%至 25%。被判断为高质量研究的研究报告 A 点的水平复发率为 8.2%。使用外部牵引器的牵引成骨术比使用内部牵引器的牵引成骨术的复发率更高。

结论:现有证据表明,对于中重度上颌骨发育不全的唇腭裂患者,上颌骨牵引成骨术具有良好的稳定性。

相似文献

[1]
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients.

Angle Orthod. 2012-4-12

[2]
Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: is it a stable technique?

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012-12

[3]
Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010-10

[4]
Long-Term Skeletal Changes After Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Children With Cleft Lip/Palate.

J Craniofac Surg. 2018-6

[5]
Comparison of long-term skeletal stability following maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction in growing and non-growing patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Orthod. 2022-1-25

[6]
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-10

[7]
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004-11

[8]
Long-term results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing cleft: 5-years experience using internal device.

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2016

[9]
Can Use of Rigid Fixation After Consolidation Increase Stability in Cleft Patients Following Distraction Osteogenesis?

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018-6

[10]
Skeletal and soft tissue changes and stability in cleft lip and palate patients after distraction osteogenesis using a new intraoral maxillary device.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Efficacy of the maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis in patients with cleft lip and palate.

BMC Oral Health. 2024-11-19

[2]
Evidence Mapping and Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews on Various Aspects Related to Cleft Lip and Palate.

J Clin Med. 2023-9-16

[3]
A Comparative Study of Skeletal and Dental Outcome between Transcutaneous External Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Rigid External Device in Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.

J Pers Med. 2022-6-29

[4]
A systematic review of therapeutic outcomes following treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the retromolar trigone.

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021-8-31

[5]
Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.

Angle Orthod. 2020-9-1

[6]
Long-term stability after multidisciplinary treatment involving maxillary distraction osteogenesis, and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for unilateral cleft lip and palate with severe occlusal collapse and gingival recession: A case report.

Korean J Orthod. 2019-1

[7]
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-10

[8]
A case of cleft lip and palate with severe maxillary retrognathism treated by distraction osteogenesis and custom made intraoral rapid maxillary expansion appliance: A 2-year follow-up of retention.

Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2018

[9]
Profile Changes and Stability following Distraction Osteogenesis with Rigid External Distraction in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.

Contemp Clin Dent. 2017

[10]
Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Oral Health. 2016-11-21

本文引用的文献

[1]
Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010-10

[2]
Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010-7

[3]
Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery--which one is more stable in 5 years?

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010-6

[4]
Skeletal and dental stability after maxillary distraction with a rigid external device in adult cleft lip and palate patients.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010-2

[5]
Five-year follow-up of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of children with cleft lip and palate.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010-4

[6]
External frame distraction osteogenesis of the midface in the cleft patient.

Indian J Plast Surg. 2009-10

[7]
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009-10

[8]
Distraction osteogenesis of the cleft maxilla.

Facial Plast Surg. 2008-11

[9]
Distraction osteogenesis in the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients.

J Craniofac Surg. 2008-9

[10]
[Distraction method of maxillary refrognatism treatment in patients with congenital cleft of upper lip and palate].

Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2008

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索