Farmer Elizabeth A, Beard Jonathan D, Dauphinee W Dale, LaDuca Tony, Mann Karen V
Department of General Practice, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Med Educ. 2002 Oct;36(10):942-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01311.x.
Increasing attention is being directed towards finding ways of assessing how well doctors perform in clinical practice. Current approaches rely on strategies directed at individuals only, but, in real life, doctors' work is characterised by multiple complex professional interactions. These interactions involve different kinds of teams and are embedded within the overall context and systems of care. In addition to individual factors, therefore, we propose that the performance of doctors in health care teams and systems will also impact on the overall quality of patient care. Assessing these dimensions, however, poses a number of challenges.
Taking a profile of a National Health Service, UK surgeon as an example, the team structures to which he or she may relate are illustrated. These include formal teams such as those found in the operating theatre, and those formed through various professional and collegial partnerships. The authors then propose a model for assessing doctors' performances in teams and systems, which incorporates the educational principles of continuous feedback to enhance future performance.
To implement the proposed model, a wide range of professional, educational and regulatory bodies must collaborate. This raises a number of important implications for the future roles and relationships of these bodies, which are discussed. A strong and constructive partnership will be essential if the full potential of a more inclusive and representative assessment approach is to be realised.
人们越来越关注如何找到评估医生临床实践表现的方法。目前的方法仅依赖于针对个体的策略,但在现实生活中,医生的工作具有多种复杂的专业互动特点。这些互动涉及不同类型的团队,并融入到整体护理环境和系统之中。因此,除了个体因素外,我们认为医生在医疗团队和系统中的表现也会影响患者护理的整体质量。然而,评估这些维度面临诸多挑战。
以英国国民医疗服务体系的一名外科医生为例,阐述了他或她可能涉及的团队结构。这些团队包括手术室中的正式团队,以及通过各种专业和同行伙伴关系形成的团队。作者随后提出了一个评估医生在团队和系统中表现的模型,该模型纳入了持续反馈的教育原则以提升未来表现。
要实施所提出的模型,众多专业、教育和监管机构必须合作。这对这些机构未来的角色和关系产生了一些重要影响,对此进行了讨论。如果要充分发挥更具包容性和代表性的评估方法的全部潜力,强大且建设性的伙伴关系至关重要。