• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测社区药剂师的护理质量:使用药房理赔数据评估绩效的可行性研究。

Monitoring community pharmacist's quality of care: a feasibility study of using pharmacy claims data to assess performance.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 1140 Pine Avenue West, H3A 1A3 Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 18;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-12.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-12
PMID:21244684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3031209/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public pressure has increasingly emphasized the need to ensure the continuing quality of care provided by health professionals over their careers. Health profession's regulatory authorities, mandated to be publicly accountable for safe and effective care, are revising their quality assurance programs to focus on regular evaluations of practitioner performance. New methods for routine screening of performance are required and the use of administrative data for measuring performance on quality of care indicators has been suggested as one attractive option. Preliminary studies have shown that community pharmacy claims databases contain the information required to operationalize quality of care indicators. The purpose of this project was to determine the feasibility of routine use of information from these databases by regulatory authorities to screen the quality of care provided at community pharmacies.

METHODS

Information from the Canadian province of Quebec's medication insurance program provided data on prescriptions dispensed in 2002 by more than 5000 pharmacists in 1799 community pharmacies. Pharmacy-specific performance rates were calculated on four quality of care indicators: two safety indicators (dispensing of contra-indicated benzodiazepines to seniors and dispensing of nonselective beta-blockers to patients with respiratory disease) and two effectiveness indicators (dispensing asthma or hypertension medications to non-compliant patients). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize performance.

RESULTS

Reliable estimates of performance could be obtained for more than 90% of pharmacies. The average rate of dispensing was 4.3% (range 0 - 42.5%) for contra-indicated benzodiazepines, 15.2% (range 0 - 100%) for nonselective beta-blockers to respiratory patients, 10.7% (range 0 - 70%) for hypertension medications to noncompliant patients, and 43.3% (0 - 91.6%) for short-acting beta-agonists in over-use situations. There were modest correlations in performance across the four indicators. Nine pharmacies (0.5%) performed in the lowest quartile in all four of the indicators, and 5.3% (n = 95) performed in the lowest quartile on three of four indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Routinely collected pharmacy claims data can be used to monitor indicators of the quality of care provided in community pharmacies, and may be useful in future to identify underperforming pharmacists, measure the impact of policy changes and determine predictors of best practices.

摘要

背景

公众压力越来越强调,医疗保健专业人员在其职业生涯中应确保持续提供高质量的护理。负责对安全有效的护理承担公共责任的卫生专业监管当局正在修订其质量保证方案,重点是定期评估从业者的绩效。需要新的常规绩效筛选方法,并且已建议将使用行政数据来衡量护理质量指标的绩效作为一种有吸引力的选择。初步研究表明,社区药房理赔数据库包含可用于实施护理质量指标的信息。本项目的目的是确定监管机构常规使用这些数据库信息筛查社区药房提供的护理质量的可行性。

方法

加拿大魁北克省的医疗保险计划提供的数据涵盖了 2002 年由 1799 家社区药房的 5000 多名药剂师开出的处方。根据四个护理质量指标计算了药房特定的绩效率:两个安全性指标(给老年人开禁忌的苯二氮䓬类药物和给患有呼吸道疾病的患者开非选择性β受体阻滞剂)和两个有效性指标(给不遵医嘱的患者开哮喘或高血压药物)。使用描述性统计数据总结了绩效。

结果

可以为 90%以上的药房获得可靠的绩效估计。禁忌苯二氮䓬类药物的平均配药率为 4.3%(范围为 0 - 42.5%),给呼吸道疾病患者开非选择性β受体阻滞剂的平均配药率为 15.2%(范围为 0 - 100%),给不遵医嘱的高血压患者开高血压药物的平均配药率为 10.7%(范围为 0 - 70%),在过度使用情况下短效β激动剂的平均配药率为 43.3%(范围为 0 - 91.6%)。四个指标之间的绩效存在适度的相关性。在所有四个指标中,有 9 家(0.5%)药房的表现处于最低四分位数,有 5.3%(n = 95)在四个指标中的三个指标中处于最低四分位数。

结论

常规收集的药房理赔数据可用于监测社区药房提供的护理质量指标,并可能有助于未来识别表现不佳的药剂师,衡量政策变化的影响以及确定最佳实践的预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e043/3031209/1840b4bd6afb/1472-6963-11-12-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e043/3031209/1840b4bd6afb/1472-6963-11-12-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e043/3031209/1840b4bd6afb/1472-6963-11-12-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Monitoring community pharmacist's quality of care: a feasibility study of using pharmacy claims data to assess performance.监测社区药剂师的护理质量:使用药房理赔数据评估绩效的可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 18;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-12.
2
Determinants of community pharmacists' quality of care: a population-based cohort study using pharmacy administrative claims data.社区药剂师护理质量的决定因素:一项基于人群的队列研究,使用药房管理索赔数据。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e015877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015877.
3
Community pharmacy and mail order cost and utilization for 90-day maintenance medication prescriptions.90天维持药物处方的社区药房和邮购成本及使用情况。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Apr;18(3):247-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.3.247.
4
Pharmacy performance while providing continuous medication monitoring.提供持续药物监测时的药房绩效。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Nov-Dec;57(6):692-697. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Analysis of pharmacist-provided medication therapy management (MTM) services in community pharmacies over 7 years.社区药房7年期间药剂师提供的药物治疗管理(MTM)服务分析
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):18-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.1.18.
6
Pharmacy participation and claim characteristics in the Wisconsin Medicaid Pharmaceutical Care Program from 1996 to 2007.1996年至2007年威斯康星医疗补助药品护理计划中的药房参与情况及报销申请特征
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Mar;18(2):116-28. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.2.116.
7
Completeness of retail pharmacy claims data: implications for pharmacoepidemiologic studies and pharmacy practice in elderly patients.零售药店理赔数据的完整性:对老年患者的药物流行病学研究和药房实践的影响。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):2048-59. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.009.
8
The pharmacists' potential to provide targets for interventions to optimize pharmacotherapy in patients with asthma.药剂师在为哮喘患者优化药物治疗提供干预目标方面的潜力。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1075-82. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9829-1. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
9
Dispensing practice in the community pharmacies in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.北塞浦路斯土耳其共和国社区药房的配药实践。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Apr;34(2):312-24. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9605-z. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
10
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional pharmacy Services' outcomes performance measurement: A narrative review.专业药学服务的结果绩效评估:一项叙述性综述。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Oct 23;16:100533. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100533. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe definition of quality indicators for pharmaceutical care: a systematic literature review and international consensus development.欧洲药学服务网络对药学服务质量指标的定义:系统文献回顾与国际共识研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Feb;46(1):70-79. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01631-8. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
3
Global core indicators for measuring WHO's paediatric quality-of-care standards in health facilities: development and expert consensus.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.在问责制和透明度呼声日益高涨的时代的共享医疗监管:美国、加拿大和英国再认证情况比较
JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):2008-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1620.
2
Assessment of the practicing physician: challenges and opportunities.执业医师评估:挑战与机遇
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Fall;28 Suppl 1:S4-10. doi: 10.1002/chp.200.
3
Hospital admissions associated with adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of prospective observational studies.
全球核心指标用于衡量世卫组织卫生机构中儿童保健质量标准:制定和专家共识。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08234-5.
4
Quality indicators and community pharmacy services: a scoping review.质量指标与社区药房服务:一项范围综述
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Dec;27(6):490-500. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12561. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
5
Determinants of community pharmacists' quality of care: a population-based cohort study using pharmacy administrative claims data.社区药剂师护理质量的决定因素:一项基于人群的队列研究,使用药房管理索赔数据。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e015877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015877.
6
[Community health in primary health care teams: a management objective].[初级卫生保健团队中的社区卫生:一项管理目标]
Aten Primaria. 2016 Dec;48(10):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2015.10.009. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
Optimising the changing role of the community pharmacist: a randomised trial of the impact of audit and feedback.优化社区药剂师不断变化的角色:一项关于审核与反馈影响的随机试验
BMJ Open. 2016 May 20;6(5):e010865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010865.
8
Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis.癌症患者生命末期的药物使用变化:一项横断面分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Apr;21(4):1003-11. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1619-0. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
9
Pharmacist provision of primary health care: a modified Delphi validation of pharmacists' competencies.药剂师提供初级卫生保健:药师能力的修正德尔菲验证。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 28;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-27.
与药物不良反应相关的住院情况:前瞻性观察性研究的系统评价
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jul;42(7):1017-25. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L037. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
4
Incidence, severity and preventability of medication-related visits to the emergency department: a prospective study.与药物相关的急诊科就诊的发生率、严重程度及可预防性:一项前瞻性研究
CMAJ. 2008 Jun 3;178(12):1563-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071594.
5
Systematic review of the incidence and characteristics of preventable adverse drug events in ambulatory care.门诊护理中可预防药物不良事件的发生率及特征的系统评价
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;41(9):1411-26. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H658. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
6
Integrating performance assessment, maintenance of competence, and continuing professional development of community pharmacists.整合社区药剂师的绩效评估、能力维持和持续专业发展。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Feb 15;71(1):15. doi: 10.5688/aj710115.
7
Can the quality of care in family practice be measured using administrative data?能否使用管理数据来衡量家庭医疗的护理质量?
Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec;41(6):2238-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00589.x.
8
Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.英国全科医疗中的绩效薪酬计划。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 27;355(4):375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa055505.
9
Adverse drug events and medication errors in Australia.澳大利亚的药物不良事件和用药错误。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Dec;15 Suppl 1:i49-59. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg085.
10
Physician clinical performance assessment: prospects and barriers.医师临床绩效评估:前景与障碍
JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1183-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.9.1183.