Suppr超能文献

制定手术团队绩效的观察性测量方法。

Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams.

作者信息

Healey A N, Undre S, Vincent C A

机构信息

Imperial College London, Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, 10th Floor QEQM, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i33-40. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i33.

Abstract

Team performance is increasingly recognised as an essential foundation of good surgical care and a determinant of good surgical outcome. To understand team performance and to develop team training, reliable and valid measures of team performance are necessary. Currently there is no firm consensus on how to measure teamwork, partly because of a lack of empirical data to validate measures. The input-process-output model provides a framework for surgical team studies. Objective observational measures are needed in surgery as a basis for interdisciplinary team assessment and training. The "observational teamwork assessment for surgery" (OTAS) tool assesses two facets of the surgical process. Observer 1 monitors specific tasks carried out by team members, under the categories patient, environment, equipment, provisions, and communications. Observer 2 uses a behavioural observation scale to rate behaviour for the three surgical phases (pre-operative, operative, and post-operative) with components of teamwork: cooperation, leadership, coordination, awareness, and communication. Illustrative data from an initial series of 50 cases is presented here. The OTAS tool enables two independent observers, a surgeon and psychologist, to record detailed information both on what the theatre team does and how they do it, and has the potential to identify constraints on performance that might relate to surgical outcome.

摘要

团队表现日益被视为优质外科护理的重要基础以及良好手术结果的决定因素。为了理解团队表现并开展团队培训,可靠且有效的团队表现衡量方法必不可少。目前对于如何衡量团队协作尚无确凿共识,部分原因是缺乏用于验证衡量方法的实证数据。输入-过程-输出模型为外科团队研究提供了一个框架。手术中需要客观的观察性衡量方法作为跨学科团队评估和培训的基础。“手术观察性团队协作评估”(OTAS)工具评估手术过程的两个方面。观察者1在患者、环境、设备、供应和沟通等类别下监测团队成员执行的特定任务。观察者2使用行为观察量表对手术三个阶段(术前、术中和术后)具有团队协作要素(合作、领导、协调、意识和沟通)的行为进行评分。此处呈现了来自最初50例病例系列的说明性数据。OTAS工具使两名独立观察者(一名外科医生和一名心理学家)能够记录关于手术团队做了什么以及如何做的详细信息,并且有可能识别出可能与手术结果相关的表现限制因素。

相似文献

1
Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams.制定手术团队绩效的观察性测量方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i33-40. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i33.
5
Content Validation and Evaluation of an Endovascular Teamwork Assessment Tool.血管内团队协作评估工具的内容效度与评价
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Jul;52(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.12.044. Epub 2016 May 25.

引用本文的文献

4
Workflow disruptions in robot-assisted surgery.机器人辅助手术中的工作流程中断。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2663-2669. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01728-2. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
6
Investigating voice in action teams: a critical review.行动团队中的语音研究:批判性综述。
Cogn Technol Work. 2021;23(3):605-624. doi: 10.1007/s10111-020-00646-9. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

3
Assessing the performance of doctors in teams and systems.评估团队和系统中医生的表现。
Med Educ. 2002 Oct;36(10):942-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01311.x.
5
Good medical practice: guidance for occupational physicians.
Occup Med (Lond). 2002 Sep;52(6):341-52. doi: 10.1093/occmed/52.6.341.
6
A systems approach to surgical safety.一种手术安全的系统方法。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jun;16(6):1005-14; discussion 1015. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8509-3. Epub 2002 May 14.
7
The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: a review of current literature.
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Mar;88(3):418-29. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.3.418.
10
The team survey: a tool for health care team development.
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Jul;35(2):276-87. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01844.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验