Suppr超能文献

吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估与电视荧光吞咽造影检查:检查类型是否会影响对咽部残留严重程度的判断?

Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?

作者信息

Kelly A M, Leslie P, Beale T, Payten C, Drinnan M J

机构信息

Head and Neck Tumour Centre, University College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Oct;31(5):425-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01292.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate whether the type of instrumental swallowing examination (Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) or videofluoroscopy) influences perception of post-swallow pharyngeal residue.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blind assessment of residue from simultaneous videofluoroscopy and FEES recordings. All raters were blind to participant details, to the pairing of the videofluoroscopy and FEES examinations and to the other raters' scores.

SETTING

Tertiary specialist ENT teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen adult participants consecutively recruited; seven women and eight men aged between 22 and 73, mean age 53. All participants underwent one FEES examination and one videofluoroscopy examination performed simultaneously.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

referred to speech and language therapy for assessment of dysphagia.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

nil by mouth or judged to be at high risk of aspiration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The FEES and videofluoroscopy examinations were recorded simultaneously. Fifteen speech and language therapists independently scored pharyngeal residue as none, coating, mild, moderate or severe. All examinations were scored twice by all raters.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-rater agreement were similar for both examinations. There were significant differences between FEES and videofluoroscopy pharyngeal residue severity scores (anova, P < 0.001). FEES residue scores were consistently higher than videofluoroscopy residue scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngeal residue was consistently perceived to be greater from FEES than from videofluoroscopy. These findings have significant clinical implications as FEES and videofluoroscopy findings are used to judge aspiration risk and to make recommendations for oral intake. Further research is required to examine the impact of FEES and videofluoroscopy examinations on treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查仪器吞咽检查类型(纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)或电视荧光吞咽造影)是否会影响对吞咽后咽部残留的认知。

设计

对同步电视荧光吞咽造影和FEES记录的残留情况进行前瞻性单盲评估。所有评分者均对参与者的详细信息、电视荧光吞咽造影和FEES检查的配对情况以及其他评分者的分数不知情。

地点

三级专科耳鼻喉教学医院。

参与者

连续招募了15名成年参与者;7名女性和8名男性,年龄在22至73岁之间,平均年龄53岁。所有参与者均同时接受了一次FEES检查和一次电视荧光吞咽造影检查。

纳入标准

因吞咽困难转诊至言语治疗科进行评估。

排除标准

禁食或被判定有高误吸风险。

主要观察指标

同时记录FEES和电视荧光吞咽造影检查。15名言语治疗师独立将咽部残留评为无、有涂层、轻度、中度或重度。所有评分者对所有检查均进行两次评分。

结果

两种检查的评分者内和评分者间一致性相似。FEES和电视荧光吞咽造影的咽部残留严重程度评分之间存在显著差异(方差分析,P < 0.001)。FEES残留评分始终高于电视荧光吞咽造影残留评分。

结论

FEES检查所观察到的咽部残留始终被认为比电视荧光吞咽造影所观察到的更多。这些发现具有重要的临床意义,因为FEES和电视荧光吞咽造影的结果用于判断误吸风险并为经口摄入提供建议。需要进一步研究以检查FEES和电视荧光吞咽造影检查对治疗决策的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验