• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显著阈上右侧单侧电休克治疗与最低阈上双侧电休克治疗:抗抑郁及记忆效应

Markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT versus minimally suprathreshold bilateral ECT: antidepressant and memory effects.

作者信息

McCall W Vaughn, Dunn Aaron, Rosenquist Peter B, Hughes Doreen

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Winston-Salem, North Carolina27127, USA.

出版信息

J ECT. 2002 Sep;18(3):126-9. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200209000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00124509-200209000-00003
PMID:12394530
Abstract

Right unilateral (RUL) ECT is reported to have fewer memory side effects than bilateral (BL) ECT. We compared RUL ECT at eight times the seizure threshold (ST) against BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Adults with major depression were randomly assigned to RUL ECT at eight times ST or BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Blinded ratings of mood and memory were made before ECT, 1 to 3 days after the final ECT, and at 2 and 4 weeks after ECT. Forty patients received RUL and 37 received BL ECT. The antidepressant response rate was not significantly different for the RUL and BL groups (60% vs. 73%). Sustained antidepressant response, accompanied by recovery from anterograde memory side effects, was seen through the first month with both treatments. Measures of mood and memory were not significantly different for the two groups at any time point. The modest sample sizes of this study do not rule out a type II error in the detection of small but meaningful differences between assigned treatments. Also, the period of post-ECT observation consisted of 1 month of naturalistic treatment. Both RUL ECT at eight times the ST and BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST produce similar mood and memory effects. Both forms of ECT produced acceptable antidepressant response rates and only transient anterograde amnesia. No clear advantage emerged for either form of ECT, and both are justifiable as first-line techniques of ECT.

摘要

据报道,右侧单侧(RUL)电休克治疗(ECT)的记忆副作用比双侧(BL)ECT少。我们将癫痫发作阈值(ST)8倍的RUL ECT与ST 1.5倍的BL ECT进行了比较。患有重度抑郁症的成年人被随机分配接受ST 8倍的RUL ECT或ST 1.5倍的BL ECT。在ECT前、最后一次ECT后1至3天以及ECT后2周和4周进行情绪和记忆的盲法评分。40例患者接受了RUL ECT,37例接受了BL ECT。RUL组和BL组的抗抑郁反应率无显著差异(60%对73%)。两种治疗在第一个月都观察到持续的抗抑郁反应,并伴有顺行性记忆副作用的恢复。两组在任何时间点的情绪和记忆测量结果均无显著差异。本研究样本量较小,不能排除在检测指定治疗之间微小但有意义的差异时出现II类错误。此外,ECT后的观察期包括1个月的自然治疗。ST 8倍的RUL ECT和ST 1.5倍的BL ECT产生相似的情绪和记忆效果。两种形式的ECT都产生了可接受的抗抑郁反应率,且只有短暂的顺行性遗忘。两种形式的ECT均未显示出明显优势,两者均可作为ECT的一线技术。

相似文献

1
Markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT versus minimally suprathreshold bilateral ECT: antidepressant and memory effects.显著阈上右侧单侧电休克治疗与最低阈上双侧电休克治疗:抗抑郁及记忆效应
J ECT. 2002 Sep;18(3):126-9. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200209000-00003.
2
Titrated moderately suprathreshold vs fixed high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: acute antidepressant and cognitive effects.滴定式中度阈上刺激与固定高剂量右侧单侧电休克治疗:急性抗抑郁和认知效应
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 May;57(5):438-44. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.438.
3
A randomized comparison of high-charge right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy and bilateral electroconvulsive therapy in older depressed patients who failed to respond to 5 to 8 moderate-charge right unilateral treatments.在对5至8次中等电量右侧单侧治疗无反应的老年抑郁症患者中,高电量右侧单侧电休克治疗与双侧电休克治疗的随机对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;63(12):1102-5. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n1203.
4
Seizure expression during electroconvulsive therapy: relationships with clinical outcome and cognitive side effects.电休克治疗期间的癫痫发作表现:与临床结局及认知副作用的关系。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Apr;29(4):813-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300377.
5
Low-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): effectiveness of the first treatment.低剂量右侧单侧电惊厥疗法(ECT):首次治疗的效果。
J ECT. 2013 Jun;29(2):83-5. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31827e0b51.
6
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities.不同刺激强度下双侧与右侧单侧电休克治疗的前瞻性、随机、双盲比较。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 May;57(5):425-34. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.425.
7
Prediction of antidepressant response in both 2.25xthreshold RUL and fixed high dose RUL ECT.预测2.25倍阈值右单侧无抽搐电休克治疗和固定高剂量右单侧无抽搐电休克治疗中的抗抑郁反应。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.030. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
8
The effects of electroconvulsive therapy on memory of autobiographical and public events.电休克治疗对自传体事件和公共事件记忆的影响。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;57(6):581-90. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.6.581.
9
Relative ineffectiveness of ultrabrief right unilateral versus bilateral electroconvulsive therapy in depression.超短右单侧与双侧电抽搐治疗抑郁症的相对无效性。
J ECT. 2009 Dec;25(4):238-42. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31819fdff7.
10
An Open-Label, Pilot Study of Daily Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Pulse Electroconvulsive Therapy.一项关于每日右侧单侧超短脉冲电休克治疗的开放标签先导研究。
J ECT. 2016 Mar;32(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000261.

引用本文的文献

1
Electroconvulsive Therapy Across Nations: A 2022 Survey of Practice.跨国家电抽搐治疗:2022 年实践调查。
J ECT. 2024 Jun 1;40(2):96-104. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000980. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
The benefits and costs of changing treatment technique in electroconvulsive therapy due to insufficient improvement of a major depressive episode.因重度抑郁发作改善不充分而改变电抽搐治疗技术的获益和成本。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):1284-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
Leveraging Neuroplasticity to Enhance Adaptive Learning: The Potential for Synergistic Somatic-Behavioral Treatment Combinations to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Depression.
利用神经可塑性增强适应性学习:协同躯体-行为治疗联合改善抑郁症临床疗效的潜力。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 15;85(6):454-465. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
4
Short- and Long-term Cognitive Outcomes in Patients With Major Depression Treated With Electroconvulsive Therapy.接受电休克治疗的重度抑郁症患者的短期和长期认知结果
J ECT. 2017 Dec;33(4):278-285. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000426.
5
Cognitive training to improve memory in individuals undergoing electroconvulsive therapy: Negative findings.认知训练改善电抽搐治疗个体的记忆:阴性结果。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;92:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
A randomized controlled trial of brief and ultrabrief pulse right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy.简短和超简短脉冲右侧单侧电休克治疗的随机对照试验
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Dec 5;18(1):pyu045. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu045.
7
Magnetic seizure therapy in an adolescent with refractory bipolar depression: a case report.磁惊厥治疗难治性双相抑郁青少年患者 1 例报告。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Oct 31;10:2049-55. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S71056. eCollection 2014.
8
Rational electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement.合理的电休克治疗电极放置
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2005 Jul;2(7):37-43.
9
Bifrontal, bitemporal and right unilateral electrode placement in ECT: randomised trial.额颞双侧和右侧单侧电极放置在电抽搐治疗中的随机试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;196(3):226-34. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066183.
10
Meta-analysis of initial seizure thresholds in electroconvulsive therapy.电抽搐治疗初始抽搐阈值的荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Dec;259(8):467-74. doi: 10.1007/s00406-009-0011-7. Epub 2009 Apr 21.