Suppr超能文献

院前临床脊柱检查标准的多中心前瞻性验证

Multicenter prospective validation of prehospital clinical spinal clearance criteria.

作者信息

Domeier Robert M, Swor Robert A, Evans Rawden W, Hancock J Brian, Fales William, Krohmer Jon, Frederiksen Shirley M, Rivera-Rivera Edgardo J, Schork M Anthony

机构信息

University of Michigan/Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Emergency Medicine Residency Program, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2002 Oct;53(4):744-50. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200210000-00021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spine immobilization is one of the most frequently performed prehospital procedures. If trauma patients without significant risk for spine injury complications can be identified, spine immobilization could be selectively performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate five prehospital clinical criteria-altered mental status, neurologic deficit, spine pain or tenderness, evidence of intoxication, or suspected extremity fracture-the absence of which identify prehospital trauma patients without a significant spine injury.

METHODS

Prospectively collected emergency medical services data items included the above-listed criteria. Outcome data include spine fracture or cord injury, and also the level and management of injuries.

RESULTS

A total of 295 patients with spine injuries were present in 8,975 (3.3%) cases. Spine injury was identified by the prehospital criteria in 280 of 295 (94.9%) injured patients. The criteria missed 15 patients. Thirteen of 15 had stable injuries, the majority of which were stable compression or vertebral process injuries. The remaining two would have been captured by more accurate prehospital evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Absence of the study criteria may form the basis of a prehospital protocol that could be used to identify trauma patients who may safely have rigid spine immobilization withheld. Evaluation of such a protocol in practice should be performed.

摘要

背景

脊柱固定是最常实施的院前急救操作之一。如果能够识别出无脊柱损伤并发症重大风险的创伤患者,脊柱固定操作可选择性进行。本研究的目的是评估五项院前临床标准——精神状态改变、神经功能缺损、脊柱疼痛或压痛、中毒迹象或疑似肢体骨折,若不存在这些情况,则可识别出无重大脊柱损伤的院前创伤患者。

方法

前瞻性收集的紧急医疗服务数据项目包括上述标准。结果数据包括脊柱骨折或脊髓损伤,以及损伤的程度和处理情况。

结果

在8975例病例中,共有295例(3.3%)患者存在脊柱损伤。295例受伤患者中有280例(94.9%)通过院前标准被识别出脊柱损伤。这些标准遗漏了15例患者。15例中有13例损伤稳定,其中大多数为稳定型压缩性骨折或椎弓根损伤。其余2例若进行更准确的院前评估本可被识别出。

结论

不存在本研究中的标准可作为一种院前方案的基础,该方案可用于识别那些可安全不进行脊柱硬固定的创伤患者。应在实践中对这样一种方案进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验