Aragonès Forès R, Orozco López P
EAP Gòtic. Barcelona. España.
Aten Primaria. 2002 Oct 15;30(6):350-6. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79046-x.
To discover how osteoporosis is tackled in Spanish primary care before the publication of the semFYC osteoporosis guide.
Self-filled questionnaire for primary care doctors sent out by commercial mail (in blocks per province).
Five thousand family medicine clinics in Spain.Participants. Doctors working in primary care.Measurements. Level of activity relating to osteoporosis in daily consultations (identification of risk factors, screening, who conducts diagnosis and follow-up, level of access to densitometry and specialist) and identification data (province, type of work centre and number of consultations per day).
414 replies embracing reformed and non-reformed centres from the entire country, with different case overloads. 32.3% stated that osteoporosis treatment was viewed as a preventive activity in their centre and only 35.5% systematically asked for family history of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis screening was high in determined situations (82.9% in vertebral compression, 78.3% in hip fracture) and deficient in others (59.6% in glucocorticoid treatment, 46.6% in colles fractures, 36% in chronic nephropathy, 29.2% in thinness, 17.1% in chronic hepatopathy and 11.8% in treatment for epilepsy or with lithium). 73.9% could not request bone densitometry and 64.3% thought that access to other care levels was complicated. 51.9% said they continued to monitor osteoporosis. The impossibility of requesting densitometry or difficult access conditioned the screening level. There were differences in access according to autonomous communities, with Catalonia having best access to Densitometry (75%), followed by the communities of Madrid, Valencia and Euskadi (30%).
Diagnosis of osteoporosis in primary care is deficient and is partly conditioned by difficulty in access to diagnostic tests and the lack of systematic screening.
在西班牙初级保健骨质疏松指南发布之前,了解西班牙初级保健中如何应对骨质疏松症。
通过商业邮件(按省份分组)向初级保健医生发送自填式问卷。
西班牙的5000家家庭医疗诊所。参与者:从事初级保健工作的医生。测量指标:日常会诊中与骨质疏松症相关的活动水平(危险因素识别、筛查、诊断和随访人员、骨密度测定和专科治疗的可及性水平)以及识别数据(省份、工作中心类型和每日会诊次数)。
来自全国改革和未改革中心的414份回复,病例负担各不相同。32.3%表示其所在中心将骨质疏松症治疗视为预防性活动,只有35.5%系统询问骨质疏松症家族史。在特定情况下骨质疏松症筛查率较高(椎体压缩时为82.9%,髋部骨折时为78.3%),而在其他情况下不足(糖皮质激素治疗时为59.6%,科雷氏骨折时为46.6%,慢性肾病时为36%,消瘦时为29.2%,慢性肝病时为17.1%,癫痫或锂治疗时为11.8%)。73.9%无法进行骨密度测定,64.3%认为获得其他护理级别很复杂。51.9%表示他们继续监测骨质疏松症。无法进行骨密度测定或获取困难影响了筛查水平。各自治区在获取方面存在差异,加泰罗尼亚骨密度测定可及性最佳(75%),其次是马德里、巴伦西亚和巴斯克自治区(30%)。
初级保健中骨质疏松症的诊断不足,部分原因是诊断检查获取困难和缺乏系统筛查。