• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm.破裂性基底动脉尖动脉瘤患者的血管内栓塞术与神经外科夹闭术对比
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;73(5):591-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.5.591.
2
Anterior Temporal Approach for Clipping of Upper Basilar Artery Aneurysms: Surgical Techniques and Treatment Outcomes.上前颞入路夹闭基底动脉上段动脉瘤:手术技术和治疗结果。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e530-e542. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.211. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: our approach.颅内动脉瘤破裂的治疗:我们的方法。
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005 Dec;48(6):325-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-915633.
4
Outcome of Ruptured Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Treatment Comparing Between Clipping and Coiling Techniques.后交通动脉动脉瘤破裂治疗中夹闭术与栓塞术的疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e183-e188. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.037. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
5
Incidence of seizures or epilepsy after clipping or coiling of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the nationwide inpatient sample database: 2002-2007.在全国住院患者样本数据库中,夹闭或栓塞破裂和未破裂脑动脉瘤后癫痫发作或癫痫的发生率:2002-2007 年。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(3):644-50; discussion 650. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821bc46d.
6
Endovascular Coiling versus Surgical Clipping for Poor-Grade Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Postoperative Complications and Clinical Outcome in a Multicenter Poor-Grade Aneurysm Study.血管内栓塞术与手术夹闭术治疗低级别破裂颅内动脉瘤:多中心低级别动脉瘤研究中的术后并发症及临床结局
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):873-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4649. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Short-Term Outcome of Clipping Versus Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Dual-Trained Cerebrovascular Surgeon: Single-Institution Experience.由双资质脑血管外科医生治疗的破裂颅内动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的短期疗效:单机构经验
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
8
Microsurgical clipping for recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular coil embolization.初次血管内弹簧圈栓塞术后复发性动脉瘤的显微外科夹闭术。
World Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;83(2):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
9
No Disparity in Outcomes Between Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后手术夹闭与血管内栓塞治疗的疗效无差异。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e318-e325. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.060. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Endovascular Coiling Versus Microsurgical Clipping for Patients With Ruptured Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Management Strategies and Clinical Outcomes of 162 Cases.破裂微小颅内动脉瘤患者的血管内栓塞与显微手术夹闭:162例患者的治疗策略与临床结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:763-769. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.079. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative assessment of woven endobridge embolization and standard coil occlusion for the treatment of ruptured basilar tip aneurysms.对比分析编织支架辅助栓塞与标准线圈栓塞治疗基底动脉尖端破裂动脉瘤的效果。
Neuroradiology. 2023 Apr;65(4):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03096-4. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
2
Outcome of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm treatment compared between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling: A single-center analysis.手术夹闭与血管内介入治疗破裂前交通动脉瘤的疗效比较:单中心分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30754. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030754.
3
A Nationwide Analysis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Mortality, Complications, and Health Economics in the USA.一项全美范围内关于美国颅内破裂动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的死亡率、并发症和卫生经济学的分析。
Transl Stroke Res. 2023 Jun;14(3):347-356. doi: 10.1007/s12975-022-01065-w. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
4
Endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review.血管内栓塞术与显微手术夹闭术治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的Meta分析和系统评价
Chin Neurosurg J. 2022 Jul 25;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41016-022-00283-3.
5
Unassisted and multiple microcatheter coiling of distal basilar aneurysms: Outcomes and literature review.单纯微导管技术辅助栓塞治疗远端基底动脉动脉瘤:结局与文献复习。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Apr;28(2):169-176. doi: 10.1177/15910199211021718. Epub 2021 May 30.
6
Endovascular embolization versus surgical clipping in a single surgeon series of basilar artery aneurysms: a complementary approach in the endovascular era.在单一外科医生系列的基底动脉动脉瘤中,血管内栓塞与手术夹闭的比较:血管内时代的互补方法。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1527-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04803-5. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
7
Clipping versus coiling in posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.后循环颅内动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Chin Neurosurg J. 2019 Jun 19;5:16. doi: 10.1186/s41016-019-0163-x. eCollection 2019.
8
Anterior temporal approach for clipping of ruptured basilar tip aneurysms: Surgical techniques and treatment outcomes.前颞入路夹闭破裂基底动脉尖部动脉瘤:手术技术与治疗结果
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Jun 13;11:146. doi: 10.25259/SNI_565_2019. eCollection 2020.
9
Clinical and experimental aspects of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的临床与实验研究
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019 Oct;25(10):1096-1112. doi: 10.1111/cns.13222.
10
Patency of Posterior Circulation Branches Covered by Flow Diverter Device: A Hemodynamic Study.血流导向装置覆盖的后循环分支的通畅性:一项血流动力学研究。
Front Neurol. 2019 Jun 19;10:658. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00658. eCollection 2019.

破裂性基底动脉尖动脉瘤患者的血管内栓塞术与神经外科夹闭术对比

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm.

作者信息

Lusseveld E, Brilstra E H, Nijssen P C G, van Rooij W J J, Sluzewski M, Tulleken C A F, Wijnalda D, Schellens R L L A, van der Graaf Y, Rinkel G J E

机构信息

Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;73(5):591-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.5.591.

DOI:10.1136/jnnp.73.5.591
PMID:12397159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1738141/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare endovascular coiling with neurosurgical clipping of ruptured basilar bifurcation aneurysms.

METHODS

Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural complications, and clinical and anatomical results were compared retrospectively in 44 coiled patients and 44 patients treated by clipping. The odds ratios for poor outcome (Glasgow outcome scale 1, 2, 3) adjusted for age, clinical condition, and aneurysm size were assessed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the endovascular group, five patients (11%) had a poor outcome v 13 (30%) in the surgical group; the adjusted odds ratio for poor outcome after coiling v clipping was 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.99). Procedural complications were more common in the surgical group. Optimal or suboptimal occlusion of the aneurysm immediately after coiling was achieved in 41 patients (93%). Clipping was successful in 40 patients (91%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that embolisation with coils is the preferred treatment for patients with ruptured basilar bifurcation aneurysms.

摘要

目的

比较破裂性基底动脉分叉部动脉瘤的血管内栓塞术与神经外科夹闭术。

方法

对44例行栓塞术患者和44例行夹闭术患者的患者及动脉瘤特征、手术并发症以及临床和解剖学结果进行回顾性比较。通过逻辑回归分析评估根据年龄、临床状况和动脉瘤大小调整后的不良预后(格拉斯哥预后量表1、2、3级)比值比。

结果

血管内治疗组有5例患者(11%)预后不良,而手术组有13例(30%);栓塞术与夹闭术后不良预后的调整后比值比为0.28(95%置信区间,0.08至0.99)。手术组的手术并发症更为常见。41例患者(93%)在栓塞术后立即实现了动脉瘤的最佳或次优闭塞。40例患者(91%)夹闭成功。

结论

结果表明,对于破裂性基底动脉分叉部动脉瘤患者,弹簧圈栓塞术是首选治疗方法。