Suppr超能文献

手术夹闭与血管内介入治疗破裂前交通动脉瘤的疗效比较:单中心分析。

Outcome of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm treatment compared between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling: A single-center analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30754. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030754.

Abstract

The optimal treatment modality for ruptured anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms is unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of endovascular coiling and surgical clipping to treat ruptured ACoA aneurysms. A retrospective analysis of 213 consecutive patients with ruptured AcoA aneurysms, who were treated with coiling or clipping between January 2010 and December 2020, was conducted. Of the 213 patients, 94 and 119 underwent clipping and coiling, respectively. The mean age was higher in the coiling group than in the clipping group (60.3 ± 13.2 vs. 53.5 ± 13.4, P < .001). The mean diameter of the aneurysmal neck was larger in the clipping group (3.4 mm vs. 3.0 mm, P = .022), whereas the dome-to-neck ratio (1.53 ± 0.52 vs. 1.70 ± 0.60, P = .031) and aspect ratio (1.67 ± 0.51 vs. 1.92 ± 0.77, P = .005) were larger in the coiling group. The prevalence of vasospasm was higher in the clipping than in the coiling group (42.6% vs. 26.9%, P = .016). The coiling group had a shorter mean intensive care unit hospitalization (18.3 vs. 12.1, P = .002) and more frequently showed favorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4, 5; 57.4% vs 73.1%, P = .016) compared to the clipping group. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that good initial WFNS grade (odds ratio [OR] = 6.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.69-16.65, P < .001), treatment with coiling (OR = 3.67, 95% CI: 1.70-7.90, P = .001), and absence of the need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion (OR = 5.21, 95% CI: 2.38-11.39, P < .001) were independent predictors of favorable outcomes in patients with ruptured ACoA aneurysms. Ruptured ACoA aneurysms can be safely and effectively treated using both clipping and coiling modalities. However, it may be beneficial to consider coiling as the first option for treating these aneurysms.

摘要

前交通动脉(ACoA)破裂动脉瘤的最佳治疗方式尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在比较血管内弹簧圈栓塞和手术夹闭治疗破裂 ACoA 动脉瘤的效果。对 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受弹簧圈栓塞或夹闭治疗的 213 例破裂 AcoA 动脉瘤患者进行回顾性分析。213 例患者中,94 例行夹闭术,119 例行弹簧圈栓塞术。与夹闭组相比,弹簧圈栓塞组患者的平均年龄更高(60.3±13.2 岁 vs. 53.5±13.4 岁,P<0.001)。夹闭组动脉瘤颈平均直径较大(3.4mm vs. 3.0mm,P=0.022),而瘤颈比(1.53±0.52 vs. 1.70±0.60,P=0.031)和形态比(1.67±0.51 vs. 1.92±0.77,P=0.005)较大。夹闭组血管痉挛发生率高于弹簧圈栓塞组(42.6% vs. 26.9%,P=0.016)。与夹闭组相比,弹簧圈栓塞组患者 ICU 住院时间更短(18.3 天 vs. 12.1 天,P=0.002),预后良好(Glasgow 预后量表 4、5 分;57.4% vs. 73.1%,P=0.016)的比例更高。多变量逻辑分析显示,良好的初始 WFNS 分级(比值比[OR] = 6.69,95%置信区间[CI]:2.69-16.65,P<0.001)、采用弹簧圈栓塞治疗(OR = 3.67,95% CI:1.70-7.90,P=0.001)和无需行脑脊液分流术(OR = 5.21,95% CI:2.38-11.39,P<0.001)是破裂 ACoA 动脉瘤患者预后良好的独立预测因素。对于破裂的 ACoA 动脉瘤,夹闭和弹簧圈栓塞都是安全有效的治疗方法。然而,考虑将弹簧圈栓塞作为治疗这些动脉瘤的首选方法可能是有益的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6065/9509031/fcf6531ef7d2/medi-101-e30754-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验