Bussey Henry
College of Pharmacy, University of Texas, Austin, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Oct 15;59(20 Suppl 6):S3-6. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.suppl_6.S3.
The benefits of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) over heparin and warfarin in treating and preventing thromboembolic disorders are discussed. Numerous advantages are associated with using heparin for treating and preventing thromboembolic disorders. Heparin's short half-life allows for relatively easy and frequent adjustments of therapy. Warfarin has a long half-life and high bioavailability that allow for once-daily administration and a prolonged pharmacodynamic effect. However, approximately 3-5% of patients develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with potentially catastrophic complications. Warfarin also has numerous limitations, including frequent and specialized monitoring, an inherent variability in response over time, a propensity for altering the international normalized ratio, and the potential for causing errors in laboratory test values. LMWHs eliminate or reduce the major disadvantages of anticoagulant therapy with heparin and warfarin. The advantages of LMWHs over unfractionated heparins include an improved pharmacokinetic profile. LMWHs are recommended for treating deep vein thrombosis (DVT). They offer convenient administration and the potential for outpatient treatment. They may also result in a slightly lower rate of thromboembolism recurrence and extend the life of cancer patients. For DVT prophylaxis, LMWHs have demonstrated efficacy with 45-70% relative-risk reduction in patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement and in patients with hip fracture. However, more data are needed for administration to special patient populations, such as the obese and those in renal failure. LMWHs eliminate or reduce the major disadvantages of anticoagulant therapy with heparin and warfarin for treating and preventing thromboembolic disorders. Further study is needed regarding their administration in special populations.
讨论了低分子量肝素(LMWHs)在治疗和预防血栓栓塞性疾病方面优于肝素和华法林的益处。使用肝素治疗和预防血栓栓塞性疾病有许多优点。肝素的半衰期短,使得治疗调整相对容易且频繁。华法林半衰期长且生物利用度高,允许每日一次给药并产生延长的药效学效应。然而,约3 - 5%的患者会发生肝素诱导的血小板减少症,并伴有潜在的灾难性并发症。华法林也有许多局限性,包括频繁且专门的监测、随时间反应的固有变异性、改变国际标准化比值的倾向以及导致实验室检测值出现误差的可能性。低分子量肝素消除或减少了肝素和华法林抗凝治疗的主要缺点。低分子量肝素相对于普通肝素的优点包括改善的药代动力学特征。低分子量肝素被推荐用于治疗深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。它们给药方便且有门诊治疗的可能性。它们还可能导致血栓栓塞复发率略低,并延长癌症患者的生存期。对于DVT预防,低分子量肝素已证明有效,在接受全髋关节或全膝关节置换的患者以及髋部骨折患者中相对风险降低45 - 70%。然而,对于特殊患者群体,如肥胖者和肾衰竭患者,给药还需要更多数据。低分子量肝素消除或减少了肝素和华法林抗凝治疗在治疗和预防血栓栓塞性疾病方面的主要缺点。关于它们在特殊人群中的给药还需要进一步研究。