Bishara Samir E, Ajlouni Raed, Laffoon John, Warren John
Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Angle Orthod. 2002 Oct;72(5):464-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0464:EOMTAC>2.0.CO;2.
In an attempt to save chair time during bonding, metal brackets have been precoated with the adhesive material. Although the adhesive used on the precoated brackets is basically similar in composition to that used for bonding uncoated brackets, there are differences in the percentages of the various ingredients incorporated in the material. These changes are intended to enhance specific clinical properties. The purpose of this study was to determine whether modifications in the composition of the adhesives, used on precoated and uncoated metal brackets, affect their shear bond strengths during the first half hour after bonding. This is the time span when the initial arch wires are ligated. Sixty freshly extracted human molars were bonded with three different compositions of the same basic adhesive. The teeth were mounted in phenolic rings. An occlusogingival load was applied to the brackets producing a shear force at the bracket-tooth interface utilizing a Zwick Universal Test Machine. Analysis of variance was used to compare the three adhesives. Significance was predetermined at < or =.05 level of confidence. The present findings indicated that the shear bond strengths of the various modifications of the adhesive used on two different precoated metal brackets were not significantly different (F-ratio = .729 and P = .407) from those obtained with the conventional adhesive used on uncoated brackets. The mean values for the shear bond strengths of the two precoated brackets were: APC = 5.1+/-1.7 MPa and APC II = 4.9+/-2.1 MPa. The shear bond strength for the conventional adhesive used on the uncoated brackets was = 5.7+/-2.4 MPa. All bracket/adhesive combinations tested provided clinically acceptable shear bond forces within the first 30 minutes after initial bonding.
为了在粘接过程中节省椅旁时间,金属托槽已预先涂有粘接材料。尽管预涂托槽上使用的粘接剂在成分上与用于粘接未涂托槽的粘接剂基本相似,但材料中各种成分的百分比存在差异。这些变化旨在增强特定的临床性能。本研究的目的是确定预涂和未涂金属托槽上使用的粘接剂成分的改变是否会影响粘接后半小时内的剪切粘接强度。这是最初结扎弓丝的时间段。用三种不同成分的同一种基本粘接剂粘接60颗新鲜拔除的人磨牙。将牙齿安装在酚醛环中。利用Zwick万能试验机对托槽施加垂直向载荷,在托槽与牙齿界面产生剪切力。采用方差分析比较三种粘接剂。显著性预先设定为置信水平<或=0.05。目前研究结果表明,两种不同预涂金属托槽上使用的粘接剂的各种改性的剪切粘接强度与未涂托槽上使用的传统粘接剂获得的剪切粘接强度没有显著差异(F值=0.729,P=0.407)。两种预涂托槽的剪切粘接强度平均值为:APC=5.1±1.7MPa,APC II=4.9±2.1MPa。未涂托槽上使用的传统粘接剂的剪切粘接强度为=5.7±2.4MPa。所有测试的托槽/粘接剂组合在初次粘接后的前30分钟内都提供了临床上可接受的剪切粘接力。