Suppr超能文献

使用相同自酸蚀底漆进行牙釉质预处理后不同正畸粘合剂的粘结强度

Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer.

作者信息

Scougall-Vilchis Rogelio J, Zárate-Díaz Chrisel, Kusakabe Shusuke, Yamamoto Kohji

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Autonomous University State of Mexico, Toluca City, Mexico.

出版信息

Aust Orthod J. 2010 May;26(1):84-9.

Abstract

AIM

To determine the shear bond strengths (SBS) of stainless steel brackets bonded with seven light-cured orthodontic adhesives after the enamel was conditioned with the same self-etching primer.

METHODS

A total of 140 extracted human molars were randomly divided into seven groups (N = 20). In all the groups, the enamel was conditioned with Transbond Plus SEP (TPSEP). Stainless steel brackets were bonded with the following orthodontic adhesives: Group I, Transbond XT; Group II, Blūgloo; Group III, BeautyOrtho Bond; Group IV, Enlight; Group V, Light Bond; Group VI, Transbond CC; Group VII, Xeno Ortho. The teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and debonded with a universal testing machine. The modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the SBS values among the groups: I (18.0 +/- 7.4 MPa); II (18.3 +/- 5.1 MPa); III (14.8 +/- 4.3 MPa); IV (18.3 +/- 7.0 MPa); V (16.4 +/- 4.3 MPa); VI (20.3 +/- 5.3 MPa); VII (15.9 +/- 6.4 MPa), but significant differences in ARI were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The seven orthodontic adhesives evaluated in this study can be successfully used for bonding stainless steel brackets when the enamel is conditioned with TPSEP, however, the differences among some groups might influence the clinical bond strengths. In addition, the amount of residual adhesive remaining on the teeth after debonding differed among the adhesives. Further studies are required to better understand the differences in SBS and ARI.

摘要

目的

确定在使用相同的自酸蚀底漆处理牙釉质后,用七种光固化正畸粘合剂粘结不锈钢托槽的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。

方法

总共140颗拔除的人磨牙随机分为七组(每组n = 20)。在所有组中,使用Transbond Plus SEP(TPSEP)处理牙釉质。用以下正畸粘合剂粘结不锈钢托槽:第一组,Transbond XT;第二组,Blūgloo;第三组,BeautyOrtho Bond;第四组,Enlight;第五组,Light Bond;第六组,Transbond CC;第七组,Xeno Ortho。将牙齿在37℃的蒸馏水中保存24小时,并用万能试验机进行脱粘。同时记录改良的粘结剂残留指数(ARI)。

结果

各组的SBS值无显著差异:第一组(18.0±7.4MPa);第二组(18.3±5.1MPa);第三组(14.8±4.3MPa);第四组(18.3±7.0MPa);第五组(16.4±4.3MPa);第六组(20.3±5.3MPa);第七组(15.9±6.4MPa),但ARI存在显著差异。

结论

本研究评估的七种正畸粘合剂在使用TPSEP处理牙釉质时可成功用于粘结不锈钢托槽,然而,部分组间差异可能会影响临床粘结强度。此外,脱粘后牙齿上残留的粘结剂数量在不同粘合剂之间有所不同。需要进一步研究以更好地了解SBS和ARI的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验