• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗格列酮与格列本脲对2型糖尿病患者心血管功能和血糖控制影响的比较。

A comparison of the effects of rosiglitazone and glyburide on cardiovascular function and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

St John Sutton Martin, Rendell Marc, Dandona Paresh, Dole Jo F, Murphy Karen, Patwardhan Rita, Patel Jai, Freed Martin

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov;25(11):2058-64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.2058.

DOI:10.2337/diacare.25.11.2058
PMID:12401757
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This open-label, active-controlled study investigated the cardiac safety and antihyperglycemic effect of rosiglitazone (RSG) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Of the 203 patients randomly assigned to RSG (4 mg b.i.d.) or glyburide (GLB) (titrated to achieve optimal glycemic control for the first 8 weeks only to limit the risk of hypoglycemia; mean 10.5 mg/day), 118 had an echocardiogram performed at week 52. Left ventricular (LV) mass index, ejection fraction, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume were assessed by M-mode echocardiography at baseline and weeks 12, 28, and 52; 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was assessed at baseline and at weeks 28 and 52. Glycemic control was assessed by measuring fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA(1c).

RESULTS

Neither treatment produced an increase in LV mass index that exceeded 1 SD. Ejection fraction did not change in either group. Both groups had clinically insignificant increases in LV end-diastolic volume. RSG, but not GLB, caused a statistically significant reduction in ambulatory diastolic blood pressure. Both treatments reduced HbA(1c) and FPG.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 52 weeks of therapy with RSG (4 mg b.i.d.) did not adversely affect cardiac structure or function in patients with type 2 diabetes and produced significant and sustained reductions in hyperglycemia. Decreases in ambulatory diastolic blood pressure with RSG were superior to those with GLB.

摘要

目的

本开放标签、活性对照研究调查了罗格列酮(RSG)在2型糖尿病患者中的心脏安全性和降糖作用。

研究设计与方法

在203例随机分配接受RSG(4mg,每日两次)或格列本脲(GLB)(仅在最初8周滴定以实现最佳血糖控制,以限制低血糖风险;平均10.5mg/天)治疗的患者中,118例在第52周进行了超声心动图检查。通过M型超声心动图在基线、第12周、28周和52周评估左心室(LV)质量指数、射血分数和左心室舒张末期容积;在基线、第28周和52周评估24小时动态血压。通过测量空腹血糖(FPG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)评估血糖控制情况。

结果

两种治疗均未使LV质量指数增加超过1个标准差。两组的射血分数均未改变。两组LV舒张末期容积均有临床上无显著意义的增加。RSG而非GLB使动态舒张压有统计学显著降低。两种治疗均降低了HbA1c和FPG。

结论

RSG(4mg,每日两次)共治疗52周对2型糖尿病患者的心脏结构或功能无不良影响,并使高血糖显著且持续降低。RSG降低动态舒张压的效果优于GLB。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the effects of rosiglitazone and glyburide on cardiovascular function and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.罗格列酮与格列本脲对2型糖尿病患者心血管功能和血糖控制影响的比较。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov;25(11):2058-64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.2058.
2
A randomized trial of rosiglitazone therapy in patients with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.罗格列酮治疗胰岛素治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Jul;24(7):1226-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1226.
3
A 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with rosiglitazone and sulfonylurea in African American and Hispanic American patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with sulfonylurea monotherapy.一项为期24周的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,旨在评估罗格列酮与磺脲类药物联合治疗对单用磺脲类药物治疗控制不佳的非裔美国人和西班牙裔美国人2型糖尿病患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1900-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.011.
4
Initial treatment with rosiglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination therapy compared with monotherapy with either rosiglitazone or metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.与罗格列酮或二甲双胍单药治疗相比,罗格列酮/二甲双胍固定剂量联合疗法用于2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的初始治疗。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006 Nov;8(6):650-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00659.x.
5
Comparison of fixed-dose rosiglitazone/metformin combination therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin in overweight individuals with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone.罗格列酮/二甲双胍固定剂量联合疗法与磺脲类药物加二甲双胍治疗单用二甲双胍血糖控制不佳的超重2型糖尿病患者的比较。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2008 Jan;116(1):6-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-984441. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
6
Rosiglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination compared with uptitrated metformin alone in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.罗格列酮/二甲双胍固定剂量复方与单独递增剂量二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病的比较:一项为期24周的多中心、随机、双盲、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Oct;27(10):1548-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.10.012.
7
Comparison of extended-release metformin in combination with a sulfonylurea (glyburide) to sulfonylurea monotherapy in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled, phase III study.成人2型糖尿病患者中缓释二甲双胍联合磺脲类药物(格列本脲)与磺脲类药物单药治疗的比较:一项多中心、双盲、随机、对照、III期研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):844-855. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.013.
8
Rosiglitazone amplifies the benefits of lifestyle intervention measures in long-standing type 2 diabetes mellitus.罗格列酮可增强长期2型糖尿病患者生活方式干预措施的益处。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2002 Jul;4(4):270-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2002.00207.x.
9
Addition of rosiglitazone to existing sulfonylurea treatment in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and exposure to hepatitis B or C.在患有2型糖尿病且感染乙型或丙型肝炎的中国患者中,在现有的磺脲类药物治疗基础上加用罗格列酮。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5(1):33-42. doi: 10.1089/152091503763816445.
10
Cardiac and glycemic benefits of troglitazone treatment in NIDDM. The Troglitazone Study Group.曲格列酮治疗非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病的心脏和血糖益处。曲格列酮研究组。
Diabetes. 1997 Mar;46(3):433-9. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.3.433.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of antidiabetic drugs on left ventricular function/dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗糖尿病药物对左心室功能/障碍的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Jan 22;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-0987-x.
2
Effects of Different Antidiabetic Medications on Endothelial Glycocalyx, Myocardial Function, and Vascular Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: One Year Follow-Up Study.不同抗糖尿病药物对2型糖尿病患者内皮糖萼、心肌功能和血管功能的影响:一年随访研究
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 5;8(7):983. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070983.
3
Sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors: Do we need them for glucose-lowering, for cardiorenal protection or both?
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2(SGLT)抑制剂:我们是为了降糖,还是为了心肾保护,又或者两者兼具而需要它们?
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):24-33. doi: 10.1111/dom.13692.
4
Effects of oral antidiabetic drugs on left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis.口服降糖药物对 2 型糖尿病患者左心室质量的影响:网状荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Sep 27;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0773-1.
5
Pulse pressure and diabetes treatments: Blood pressure and pulse pressure difference among glucose lowering modality groups in type 2 diabetes.脉压与糖尿病治疗:2型糖尿病患者降糖治疗方式组间的血压及脉压差异
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(6):e9791. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009791.
6
Cardiac dysfunction in type II diabetes: a bittersweet, weighty problem, or both?2型糖尿病中的心脏功能障碍:一个苦乐参半、严重的问题,还是两者皆是?
Acta Diabetol. 2017 Jan;54(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s00592-016-0911-8. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
7
Role of Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress in Glucose Tolerance, Insulin Resistance, and Cardiac Diastolic Dysfunction.线粒体氧化应激在葡萄糖耐量、胰岛素抵抗和心脏舒张功能障碍中的作用
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 5;5(5):e003046. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003046.
8
Pioglitazone-induced congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema in a patient with preserved ejection fraction.吡格列酮诱发射血分数保留患者的充血性心力衰竭和肺水肿。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):41-3. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.179363.
9
Pioglitazone Protected against Cardiac Hypertrophy via Inhibiting AKT/GSK3β and MAPK Signaling Pathways.吡格列酮通过抑制AKT/GSK3β和MAPK信号通路预防心脏肥大。
PPAR Res. 2016;2016:9174190. doi: 10.1155/2016/9174190. Epub 2016 Mar 27.
10
Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Mellitus: Complication of the Disease or of Antihyperglycemic Medications.糖尿病中的心血管风险:疾病并发症还是降糖药物所致?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Aug;98(2):145-61. doi: 10.1002/cpt.143. Epub 2015 Jul 3.