• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.

作者信息

Seshadri Niranjan, Whitlow Patrick L, Acharya Naveen, Houghtaling Penny, Blackstone Eugene H, Ellis Stephen G

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2002 Oct 29;106(18):2346-50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036595.92742.69.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.0000036595.92742.69
PMID:12403665
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the advent of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), technological advances, adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and increasing operator experience have contributed to lowering the occurrence of major complications. However, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) for failed PCI is still associated with important morbidity and mortality, even in the era of coronary stenting. We sought to determine the prevalence, indications, predictors, and complications of emergency CABG after PCI in the past decade.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed 18 593 PCIs performed from 1992 through 2000. There was a need for emergency CABG in 113 (0.61%) cases. The major indications were extensive dissection (n=61, 54%), perforation/tamponade (n=23, 20%), and recurrent acute closure (n=23, 20%). Prevalence of emergency CABG decreased from 1.5% of PCIs in 1992 to 0.14% in 2000 (P<0.001). Independent predictors of the need for emergency CABG included the worst ACC/AHA scoring of the intervened lesion (P<0.001) and female sex (P= 0.028), whereas history of prior bypass surgery and use of stents resulted in a decreased need for emergency CABG (P<0.001 for both). In patients undergoing emergency CABG, there were 17 (15%) in-hospital deaths, 14 (12%) perioperative Q-wave myocardial infarctions, and 6 (5%) cerebrovascular accidents.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for emergency CABG has considerably decreased over time. Risk factors include female sex and a higher ACC/AHA score of the intervened lesion. However, morbidity and mortality of emergency CABG remain high even in the new millennium.

摘要

相似文献

1
Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.
Circulation. 2002 Oct 29;106(18):2346-50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036595.92742.69.
2
Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的急诊冠状动脉搭桥手术:1979年至2003年发病率、临床特征及适应证的变化
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 6;46(11):2004-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.083. Epub 2005 Nov 4.
3
Outcomes of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术和急性冠状动脉综合征患者的结局:来自 ACUITY(急性血管造影和紧急介入治疗分诊策略)试验的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep;5(9):919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.009.
4
Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after failed percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗失败后的急诊冠状动脉搭桥手术。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2009 Dec;50(6):795-800.
5
5-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions the Milan experience.药物洗脱支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干病变的 5 年结果:米兰经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.014.
6
Characteristics, treatment and outcome of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and multivessel coronary artery disease: observations from PURSUIT (platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrelin therapy).非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的特征、治疗及预后:来自PURSUIT研究(不稳定型心绞痛中的血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa:使用依替巴肽治疗抑制受体)的观察结果
Cardiology. 2002;98(4):195-201. doi: 10.1159/000067321.
7
Requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass surgery following percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era.支架时代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术的需求
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 1;103(7):950-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.025.
8
Impact of bleeding on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention results from a patient-level pooled analysis of the REPLACE-2 (randomized evaluation of PCI linking angiomax to reduced clinical events), ACUITY (acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy), and HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trials.REPLACE-2(随机评估 PCI 联合依维莫司降低临床事件)、ACUITY(急性导管插入术和紧急介入治疗策略)和 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与预后的调和)试验的患者水平汇总分析结果:出血对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后死亡率的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):654-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.011.
9
Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention versus balloon angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparison of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与球囊血管成形术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的比较:美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究与旁路血管成形术血运重建调查(BARI)研究的对比
Circulation. 2002 Sep 24;106(13):1627-33. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000031570.27023.79.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在原发性动脉与先前冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的旁路移植术:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):844-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpretable machine learning-based predictive modeling of patient outcomes following cardiac surgery.基于可解释机器学习的心脏手术后患者预后预测模型
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;169(1):114-123.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.11.034. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
Surgical coronary revascularization in patients with COVID-19; complications and outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.2019冠状病毒病患者的外科冠状动脉血运重建术;并发症与结局:一项回顾性队列研究
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 10;5(5):e751. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.751. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Current Report From the North-Rhine Westphalia Surgical Myocardial Infarction Registry.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者的冠状动脉旁路移植术:来自北莱茵-威斯特法伦州外科心肌梗死登记处的最新报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e021182. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021182. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
4
Commentary: Cath lab 911.评论:导管室紧急救援。
JTCVS Tech. 2021 Apr 3;7:159-160. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.03.033. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Relation to the Institutional Volume of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果与冠状动脉旁路移植手术机构手术量的关系
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 27;9(5):1267. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051267.
6
Off-site primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a new centre is safe: comparing clinical outcomes with a hospital with surgical backup.在新中心进行院外直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是安全的:将临床结果与有外科支持的医院进行比较。
Neth Heart J. 2016 Oct;24(10):581-8. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0872-0.
7
Complications of coronary intervention: abrupt closure, dissection, perforation.冠状动脉介入治疗的并发症:急性闭塞、夹层形成、穿孔。
Heart Asia. 2013 May 3;5(1):61-5. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2013-010304. eCollection 2013.
8
Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Indications and Outcomes from 2003 through 2013.急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术:2003年至2013年的适应症及结果
Tex Heart Inst J. 2016 Jun 1;43(3):214-9. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4978. eCollection 2016 Jun.
9
Predicting emergency coronary artery bypass graft following PCI: application of a computational model to refer patients to hospitals with and without onsite surgical backup.预测PCI术后急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术:应用计算模型将患者转诊至有或无现场手术支持的医院。
Open Heart. 2015 Dec 1;2(1):e000243. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000243. eCollection 2015.
10
Does Parsonnet scoring model predict mortality following adult cardiac surgery in India?帕尔森内特评分模型能否预测印度成人心脏手术后的死亡率?
Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):161-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.154468.