Khairy Paul, Nattel Stanley
Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Que.
CMAJ. 2002 Oct 29;167(9):1012-20.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Two generally acceptable strategies exist for long-term AF management, with ongoing studies comparing the overall mortality associated with each. One strategy aims to maintain sinus rhythm, with antiarrhythmic agents if necessary, thereby preserving physiological cardiac electrical function but exposing the patient to the potential side effects of potent drugs. The second approach is to control the ventricular rate and prevent thromboembolic complications with anticoagulants, leaving the patient with AF. Both beta-blocking agents and calcium antagonists are more effective than digoxin in achieving rate control. Several nonpharmacological therapies including catheter ablation, implantable devices and surgical interventions show promise for rate control and maintenance of sinus rhythm. This paper provides an overview of new developments in pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapy. Key features of recently published clinical guidelines, including a unified classification scheme for AF and issues relating to rate control and maintenance of sinus rhythm, are considered. In addition, preliminary results from the recently presented AFFIRM study, the largest AF trial to date, are summarized. Finally, we discuss recent insights into the basic mechanisms underlying AF that have potentially significant clinical implications.
心房颤动(AF)是心血管疾病发病和死亡的常见原因。目前存在两种普遍认可的长期房颤管理策略,正在进行的研究比较了每种策略的总体死亡率。一种策略旨在维持窦性心律,必要时使用抗心律失常药物,从而保留生理性心脏电功能,但会使患者面临强效药物的潜在副作用。第二种方法是控制心室率并用抗凝剂预防血栓栓塞并发症,让患者维持房颤状态。在实现心率控制方面,β受体阻滞剂和钙拮抗剂都比地高辛更有效。包括导管消融、植入式装置和手术干预在内的几种非药物疗法在心率控制和窦性心律维持方面显示出前景。本文概述了药物和非药物治疗的新进展。考虑了最近发布的临床指南的关键特征,包括房颤的统一分类方案以及与心率控制和窦性心律维持相关的问题。此外,总结了最近公布的迄今为止最大的房颤试验AFFIRM研究的初步结果。最后,我们讨论了最近对房颤潜在重要临床意义的基本机制的见解。