Seeff Leonard B
Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hepatology. 2002 Nov;36(5 Suppl 1):S35-46. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36806.
Much controversy surrounds the issue of the natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Many authorities view the disease as inexorably progressive with a high probability of advancing over time to cirrhosis and occasionally hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and, therefore, likely to be responsible for causing death. Others regard chronic hepatitis C as having a variable outcome, the majority of infected persons not dying from the disease, but more likely from the comorbid conditions that so often accompany infection by this agent, or from more common medical conditions. Disagreements probably derive from the manner of conduct of the study and the populations studied. Efforts to determine natural history are handicapped by the primary characteristics of the disease, namely that its onset rarely is recognized and its course is prolonged exceedingly. Thus, different outcomes have come from retrospective rather than from prospective studies, but both have concluded that at least 20% of chronically infected adults develop cirrhosis within 20 years. More recent studies that used a retrospective/prospective approach, focusing largely on young infected individuals, have produced different results. Among these young people, particularly young women, spontaneous resolution of the viral infection is more common than previously thought and cirrhosis has been identified in 5% or fewer of them. The major failing for all groups studied, young and old, is that natural history studies have rarely exceeded the first 2 decades, so that outcome beyond this time is not known, other than through modeling. Several host-related and extraneous factors probably affect the natural history.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的自然史问题存在诸多争议。许多权威人士认为该疾病会不可避免地进展,随着时间推移很有可能发展为肝硬化,偶尔还会发展为肝细胞癌(HCC),因此很可能导致死亡。另一些人则认为慢性丙型肝炎的预后各不相同,大多数感染者并非死于该疾病,而是更有可能死于常伴随这种病原体感染出现的合并症,或者死于更常见的医疗状况。分歧可能源于研究的开展方式和所研究的人群。确定自然史的努力受到该疾病主要特征的阻碍,即其发病很少被察觉,病程极为漫长。因此,不同的结果来自回顾性研究而非前瞻性研究,但两者都得出结论,至少20%的慢性感染成年人在20年内会发展为肝硬化。最近采用回顾性/前瞻性方法的研究,主要聚焦于年轻感染者,得出了不同的结果。在这些年轻人中,尤其是年轻女性,病毒感染的自发清除比之前认为的更为常见,并且只有5%或更少的人被诊断出肝硬化。所有研究群体,无论年轻还是年老,主要的不足之处在于自然史研究很少超过最初的20年,所以除了通过模型预测外,这段时间之后的结果尚不清楚。一些与宿主相关的和外部因素可能会影响自然史。