Suppr超能文献

一项评估艾考糊精在腹膜透析中疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis.

作者信息

Wolfson Marsha, Piraino Beth, Hamburger Richard J, Morton A Ross

机构信息

Renal Division, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, McGaw Park, IL 60085-6730, USA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Nov;40(5):1055-65. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.36344.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article presents the results of two randomized, double-blind, controlled studies conducted to compare the efficacy and long-term safety of icodextrin and 2.5% dextrose for the once-daily long dwell in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD).

METHODS

Both studies were active-control comparisons of 7.5% icodextrin and 2.5% dextrose for the once-daily long dwell. The efficacy study was a 4-week evaluation of net ultrafiltration and peritoneal clearances of creatinine and urea nitrogen in 175 CAPD patients. The 52-week study in CAPD and APD patients examined the long-term safety of icodextrin and longer term effects, such as body weight and quality of life.

RESULTS

Mean net ultrafiltration (587.2 versus 346.2 mL, P < 0.001) and clearances of urea nitrogen (4.5 versus 4.1 mL/min, P < 0.001) and creatinine (4.0 versus 3.5 mL/min, P < 0.001) were increased significantly with icodextrin. Patients receiving icodextrin had no increase in weight after 52 weeks, in contrast to a weight gain of almost 2 kg in the dextrose group (P < 0.05). There were significantly fewer patients reporting edema in the icodextrin group compared with the dextrose group (6.3% versus 17.9%, P < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for the incidence and severity of adverse events. There were small decreases in sodium and chloride and increases in alkaline phosphatase with icodextrin.

CONCLUSION

Icodextrin provides patients with greater fluid removal and small solute clearance, no weight gain over 52 weeks, and a decreased risk of edema.

摘要

背景

本文介绍了两项随机、双盲、对照研究的结果,这些研究旨在比较艾考糊精和2.5%葡萄糖用于持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)和自动化腹膜透析(APD)每日一次长时间留腹的疗效和长期安全性。

方法

两项研究均为7.5%艾考糊精和2.5%葡萄糖每日一次长时间留腹的活性对照比较。疗效研究对175例CAPD患者进行了为期4周的净超滤以及肌酐和尿素氮腹膜清除率评估。针对CAPD和APD患者的52周研究考察了艾考糊精的长期安全性以及体重和生活质量等长期影响。

结果

使用艾考糊精时,平均净超滤量(587.2对346.2 mL,P<0.001)、尿素氮清除率(4.5对4.1 mL/分钟,P<0.001)和肌酐清除率(4.0对3.5 mL/分钟,P<0.001)均显著增加。接受艾考糊精治疗的患者在52周后体重未增加,相比之下,葡萄糖组体重增加了近2 kg(P<0.05)。与葡萄糖组相比,艾考糊精组报告水肿的患者明显更少(6.3%对17.9%,P<0.01)。两组间不良事件的发生率和严重程度无统计学显著差异。使用艾考糊精时,钠和氯略有降低,碱性磷酸酶升高。

结论

艾考糊精能使患者排出更多液体、清除小分子溶质,52周内体重不增加,且水肿风险降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验