Suppr超能文献

自然头位——可重复性的考量

Natural head posture--considerations of reproducibility.

作者信息

Bister D, Edler R J, Tom B D M, Prevost A T

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Norman Rowe Maxillofacial Unit, Queen Mary's University Hospital, Roehampton, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2002 Oct;24(5):457-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.5.457.

Abstract

This three-part study investigated the reproducibility of natural head posture (NHP) using radiographs and photographs. In part 1, reproducibility of cephalograms 1 year after the introduction of NHP was investigated and found to be less favourable (Dahlberg coefficient of 2.99 degrees) than most other previous investigations. In order to minimize radiation exposure of patients, reproducibility of photographs and method agreement between photographs and cephalograms were investigated in part 2. Reproducibility of the two photographs was poor (2.71 degrees). However, method agreement between cephalograms and the photographs taken at the same time was good (1.39 degrees). Replacement of the radiographic method with the photographic method for assessing NHP reproducibility appeared justified. Changing the protocol for achieving NHP in part 3 of the study improved reproducibility substantially (1.41 degrees). Various statistical methods were used to assess reproducibility and method agreement. Bland and Altman's graphical representation was found to be the most appropriate for method agreement. The Dahlberg coefficient, commonly used to assess NHP repeatability/reproducibility, does not provide an extreme enough interval to allow a sufficient clinical assessment of a method to be undertaken, compared with the reproducibility coefficient. That is, the latter provides a 95 per cent range, compared with 52 per cent with Dahlberg.

摘要

这项分为三个部分的研究使用X光片和照片对自然头位(NHP)的可重复性进行了调查。在第一部分中,对引入NHP一年后的头颅侧位片的可重复性进行了调查,发现其可重复性不如之前的大多数其他研究(达尔伯格系数为2.99度)。为了尽量减少患者的辐射暴露,在第二部分中对照片的可重复性以及照片与头颅侧位片之间的方法一致性进行了调查。两张照片的可重复性较差(2.71度)。然而,头颅侧位片与同时拍摄的照片之间的方法一致性良好(1.39度)。用摄影方法替代放射学方法来评估NHP的可重复性似乎是合理的。在研究的第三部分中改变实现NHP的方案后,可重复性大幅提高(1.41度)。使用了各种统计方法来评估可重复性和方法一致性。发现布兰德和奥特曼的图形表示法最适合用于方法一致性评估。与可重复性系数相比,常用的评估NHP重复性/可重复性的达尔伯格系数没有提供足够宽的区间来进行充分的临床方法评估。也就是说,后者提供了95%的范围,而达尔伯格系数为52%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验