Yoo Sua, Grimm Daniel, Zhu Ron, Jursinic Paul, Lopez Francisco, Rownd Jason, Gillin Michael
Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, 53792, USA.
Med Phys. 2002 Oct;29(10):2269-73. doi: 10.1118/1.1508376.
Historically, there have been a variety of dosimetry protocols used for kilovoltage x-ray therapy beams with a set of conversion factors and correction factors taken from different references. Corresponding to the continued installation and use of kilovoltage machines, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) presented a unified protocol developed by Task Group 61 (TG61). TG61 determines the absorbed dose to water with an ionization chamber calibrated in air in terms of air kerma (Nk). TG61 presents both an in-air method and an in-phantom method. In this work we only examine the TG61 in-air method. Our traditional dosimetry procedure, which is based upon NCRP Report 69 and on material found in standard medical physics texts, has been compared to the TG61. A variety of kilovoltage beam energies were examined with a set of various field sizes and source to surface distances. TG61 published updated data for the mass absorption coefficient ratios, backscatter factors, and the average energy per ion pair factor. The following conclusions have been reached: (1) Our traditional procedures and the TG61 protocol for in-air measurements are equivalent. (2) The conversion and correction factors used in TG61 are different by up to 4.5% compared to the old factors that we have used. (3) The application of the TG61 factors can result in up to 5% differences in the determination of the absorbed dose.
从历史上看,用于千伏级X射线治疗束的剂量测定协议多种多样,其中一组转换因子和校正因子取自不同的参考文献。随着千伏级设备的持续安装和使用,美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)提出了由任务组61(TG61)制定的统一协议。TG61根据在空气中校准的电离室,以空气比释动能(Nk)来确定水的吸收剂量。TG61既提出了空气中方法,也提出了模体中方法。在这项工作中,我们只研究TG61空气中方法。我们基于NCRP第69号报告和标准医学物理教材中的内容的传统剂量测定程序,已与TG61进行了比较。使用一组各种射野尺寸和源皮距,对多种千伏级束能量进行了研究。TG61公布了质量吸收系数比、反向散射因子和每离子对平均能量因子的更新数据。得出了以下结论:(1)我们的传统程序与TG61空气中测量协议等效。(2)与我们使用的旧因子相比,TG61中使用的转换和校正因子相差高达4.5%。(3)应用TG61因子可能导致吸收剂量测定结果相差高达5%。