• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌护理质量:我们了解什么?

Quality of breast cancer care: what do we know?

作者信息

Malin Jennifer L, Schuster Mark A, Kahn Katherine A, Brook Robert H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, 90095-1736, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov 1;20(21):4381-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.020.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2002.04.020
PMID:12409338
Abstract

PURPOSE

To critically review studies that describe patterns of care for breast cancer patients and to examine the data sources used for case identification and determining patterns of care.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE database (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) in August 2001 for studies of breast cancer care published from January 1985 to June 2001. Thirty-eight articles, describing 32 studies, met the inclusion criteria for this review.

RESULTS

According to the patterns of care literature, approximately 10% of women do not have an axillary lymph node dissection, 11% to 26% do not have their hormone receptor status reported, 20% do not receive radiation after breast-conserving surgery, and 30% to 70% of women with lymph node-positive breast cancer are not prescribed tamoxifen. Twenty-five (78%) of the studies relied on cancer registries for case identification. Cancer registries (47%) and the medical record (38%) were the most frequent sources of data on process of care. Twenty percent of the articles reported using more than one data source to determine patterns of care.

CONCLUSION

Although more patterns of care research has taken place in breast cancer than in any other oncologic condition, we found the available data had many limitations. These limitations highlight the challenges of quality-of-care research. To track changes in the quality of cancer care that may result from our rapidly transforming health care system, we need reliable data on the quality of current practice.

摘要

目的

严格审查描述乳腺癌患者护理模式的研究,并检查用于病例识别和确定护理模式的数据源。

方法

我们于2001年8月在MEDLINE数据库(美国国立医学图书馆,马里兰州贝塞斯达)中搜索了1985年1月至2001年6月发表的乳腺癌护理研究。38篇文章,描述了32项研究,符合本综述的纳入标准。

结果

根据护理模式文献,约10%的女性未进行腋窝淋巴结清扫,11%至26%的女性未报告其激素受体状态,20%的女性在保乳手术后未接受放疗,30%至70%的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性未服用他莫昔芬。25项(78%)研究依靠癌症登记处进行病例识别。癌症登记处(47%)和病历(38%)是护理过程数据最常见的来源。20%的文章报告使用了不止一个数据源来确定护理模式。

结论

尽管乳腺癌护理模式的研究比其他任何肿瘤疾病都多,但我们发现现有数据存在许多局限性。这些局限性凸显了护理质量研究的挑战。为了追踪我们快速变革的医疗保健系统可能导致的癌症护理质量变化,我们需要关于当前实践质量的可靠数据。

相似文献

1
Quality of breast cancer care: what do we know?乳腺癌护理质量:我们了解什么?
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov 1;20(21):4381-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.020.
2
Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study.基于病历回顾或医疗保险索赔定义乳腺癌护理:来自疾病预防控制中心护理模式研究的信息。
Ann Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;22(11):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
3
Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline.早期浸润性乳腺癌的外科治疗:实践指南
Can J Surg. 2005 Jun;48(3):185-94.
4
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.美国国立卫生研究院共识发展会议声明:乳腺癌辅助治疗,2000年11月1日至3日。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001(30):5-15.
5
Hospital variables associated with quality of care for breast cancer patients.与乳腺癌患者护理质量相关的医院变量。
JAMA. 1991 Dec 25;266(24):3429-32.
6
Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.索赔数据与医院注册数据相关联,可以提高乳腺癌护理质量的评估。
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;101(7):593-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.21528.
7
The case identification challenge in measuring quality of cancer care.衡量癌症护理质量中的病例识别挑战。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Nov 1;20(21):4353-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.05.527.
8
1998-1999 patterns of care study process survey of national practice patterns using breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy in the management of stage I-II breast cancer.1998 - 1999年护理模式研究:关于在I - II期乳腺癌治疗中采用保乳手术和放疗的全国实践模式的过程调查
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 May 1;62(1):183-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.019.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures.美国临床肿瘤学会/美国国立综合癌症网络质量指标
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3631-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5068.
10
The quality of care for treatment of early stage breast carcinoma: is it consistent with national guidelines?早期乳腺癌治疗的护理质量:是否符合国家指南?
Cancer. 1998 Jul 15;83(2):302-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Care for Prostate Cancer in Kashmir, India: A Real-World Study.印度克什米尔地区前列腺癌的医疗质量:一项真实世界研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 15;15(8):e43507. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43507. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Patterns of better breast cancer care in countries with higher human development index and healthcare expenditure: Insights from GLOBOCAN 2020.高人类发展指数和高医疗支出国家中更好的乳腺癌护理模式:来自 GLOBOCAN 2020 的洞察。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 12;11:1137286. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137286. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of the breast cancer care network within the Lazio Region (Central Italy).
评估拉齐奥地区(意大利中部)的乳腺癌护理网络。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0238562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238562. eCollection 2020.
4
Factors analysis on the use of key quality indicators for narrowing the gap of quality of care of breast cancer.影响乳腺癌诊疗质量差距关键质量指标应用因素分析
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6334-5.
5
Efficacy and safety of accelerated partial breast irradiation: a meta-analysis of published randomized studies.加速部分乳腺照射的疗效与安全性:已发表随机研究的荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 13;8(35):59581-59591. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19225. eCollection 2017 Aug 29.
6
The quality of invasive breast cancer care for low reimbursement rate patients: A retrospective study.低报销率患者浸润性乳腺癌护理质量:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184866. eCollection 2017.
7
A feasibility study to assess the validity of administrative data sources and self-reported information of breast cancer survivors.一项评估行政数据源和乳腺癌幸存者自我报告信息有效性的可行性研究。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Dec 1;5:50. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0111-6. eCollection 2016.
8
Disease Management Project Breast Cancer in Hesse - 5-Year Survival Data: Successful Model of Intersectoral Communication for Quality Assurance.黑森州乳腺癌疾病管理项目——5年生存数据:质量保证跨部门沟通的成功模式
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014 Mar;74(3):276-283. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368169.
9
Accelerated partial breast irradiation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis.加速部分乳房照射治疗乳腺癌:荟萃分析。
Transl Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;6(6):619-27. doi: 10.1593/tlo.13580.
10
Using the American College of Surgeons cancer registry to drive quality.利用美国外科医师学会癌症登记处来提高质量。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 May;9(3):149-51. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000955.