• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国临床肿瘤学会/美国国立综合癌症网络质量指标

American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures.

作者信息

Desch Christopher E, McNiff Kristen K, Schneider Eric C, Schrag Deborah, McClure Joan, Lepisto Eva, Donaldson Molla S, Kahn Katherine L, Weeks Jane C, Ko Clifford Y, Stewart Andrew K, Edge Stephen B

机构信息

National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3631-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5068.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5068
PMID:18640941
Abstract

PURPOSE

The National Cancer Policy Board recommended the creation of quality measures and a national reporting system in 1999. Representatives from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) collaborated to create metrics suitable for national performance measurement.

METHODS

Content and methodology experts nominated by ASCO and NCCN met to select and refine metrics for breast, colon, and rectal cancer based on National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality and NCCN measures and NCCN and ASCO guidelines. Measures were selected based on their impact on disease free and overall survival, the degree to which opportunities for improvement exist, and the feasibility of data collection.

RESULTS

Three breast cancer measures and four colorectal cancer measures were chosen. Measures for breast cancer included adjuvant hormone therapy for hormone receptor-positive tumors, chemotherapy for hormone receptor-negative cancer, and radiation after lumpectomy. Colorectal measures included adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy for rectal cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. All but one were recommended as accountability measures and one for quality improvement (removal and examination of 12 or more lymph nodes in colon cancer). Specifications were developed for each measure using tumor registries as the data source.

CONCLUSION

ASCO/NCCN measures can be implemented by health systems, provider groups or payors for improvement or accountability using local tumor registries to furnish data on staging and treatment.

摘要

目的

国家癌症政策委员会在1999年建议制定质量指标和国家报告系统。美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)的代表合作制定适用于国家绩效评估的指标。

方法

由ASCO和NCCN提名的内容和方法专家会面,根据国家癌症护理质量倡议、NCCN指标以及NCCN和ASCO指南,选择并完善乳腺癌、结肠癌和直肠癌的指标。根据指标对无病生存期和总生存期的影响、存在改进机会的程度以及数据收集的可行性来选择指标。

结果

选择了三项乳腺癌指标和四项结直肠癌指标。乳腺癌指标包括激素受体阳性肿瘤的辅助激素治疗、激素受体阴性癌症的化疗以及乳房肿瘤切除术后的放疗。结直肠癌指标包括直肠癌的辅助放疗和化疗以及结肠癌的辅助化疗。除一项外,所有指标均被推荐作为问责指标,一项作为质量改进指标(结肠癌切除并检查12个或更多淋巴结)。使用肿瘤登记处作为数据源为每项指标制定了规范。

结论

卫生系统、医疗机构团体或付款方可采用ASCO/NCCN指标,利用当地肿瘤登记处提供分期和治疗数据,以实现改进或问责。

相似文献

1
American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures.美国临床肿瘤学会/美国国立综合癌症网络质量指标
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3631-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5068.
2
Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?国家癌症护理质量倡议的结果:我们如何提高美国的癌症护理质量?
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3365. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
3
Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.在一所大学综合癌症中心实施肿瘤学质量实践倡议。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3802-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6770. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
4
A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.一种衡量癌症护理质量的方法:肿瘤学质量实践倡议。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6233-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.948. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
5
The National Cancer Data Base: a clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool.国家癌症数据库:一种临床监测与质量改进工具。
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jan;85(1):1-3. doi: 10.1002/jso.10320.
6
Using QRRO survey data to assess compliance with quality indicators for breast and prostate cancer.使用QRRO调查数据评估乳腺癌和前列腺癌质量指标的合规情况。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Jun;6(6):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.11.008.
7
Improving breast cancer care through a regional quality collaborative.通过区域质量协作提高乳腺癌护理水平。
Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):635-42. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.071.
8
ACC/AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会护理指标分类:绩效指标与质量指标:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会绩效指标特别工作组报告
Circulation. 2008 Dec 9;118(24):2662-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191107. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
9
Institutional validation of breast cancer treatment guidelines.乳腺癌治疗指南的机构验证
J Surg Res. 2001 Sep;100(1):106-9. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2000.5895.
10
Panel discussion. Data needs in cancer.小组讨论。癌症研究中的数据需求。
Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Nov;12(11A):147-56.

引用本文的文献

1
The Magnitude of Delay in Non-metastatic Breast Cancer Treatment in a Tertiary Hospital: an Analysis from 2012 to 2018.一家三级医院非转移性乳腺癌治疗的延迟程度:2012年至2018年的分析
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jun 30;59(8):45-51. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9028. eCollection 2025.
2
A taxonomy of the factors contributing to the overtreatment of cancer patients at the end of life. What is the problem? Why does it happen? How can it be addressed?一份关于导致癌症患者临终过度治疗因素的分类法。问题是什么?为何会发生?如何解决?
ESMO Open. 2025 Jan;10(1):104099. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104099. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
3
Preexisting Diabetes and Breast Cancer Treatment Among Low-Income Women.
低收入女性的既有糖尿病与乳腺癌治疗。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249548. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9548.
4
Sentinel node in breast cancer as an indicator of quality in medical care: Evaluation of statistics in Colombia.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结作为医疗质量的指标:哥伦比亚的统计评估。
Breast Dis. 2024;43(1):65-69. doi: 10.3233/BD-230059.
5
Guideline-concordant breast cancer care by patient race and ethnicity accounting for individual-, facility- and area-level characteristics: a SEER-Medicare study.基于个体、机构和地区特征考虑患者种族和民族的指南一致的乳腺癌护理:一项 SEER-医疗保险研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jul;35(7):1017-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01859-3. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
6
Simulating the population impact of interventions to reduce racial gaps in breast cancer treatment.模拟干预措施对减少乳腺癌治疗中种族差距的人群影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jun 7;116(6):902-910. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae019.
7
Association Between Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities and Hospital Performance in Treatment and Outcomes for Patients with Colon Cancer.种族和社会经济差异与结肠癌患者治疗和结局的医院绩效之间的关联。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):1075-1086. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14607-9. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
8
Contributing and limiting factors to guideline-adherent therapy in senior and elderly breast cancer patients: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study using clinical and cancer registry data in Germany.老年乳腺癌患者遵循指南治疗的促成和限制因素:一项基于问卷调查的德国临床和癌症登记数据的横断面研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(19):17297-17306. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05446-y. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
9
Patterns of Evidence-Based Care for the Diagnosis, Staging, and First-line Treatment of Breast Cancer by Race-Ethnicity: A SEER-Medicare Study.基于证据的乳腺癌诊断、分期和一线治疗的护理模式:一项 SEER-医疗保险研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Oct 2;32(10):1312-1322. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0218.
10
Understanding the Impact of Medicaid-Serving Primary Care Team Functioning and Clinical Context on Cancer Care Treatment Quality: Implications for Addressing Structural Inequities.理解医疗补助服务初级保健团队功能和临床环境对癌症护理治疗质量的影响:解决结构性不平等问题的启示。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jan;19(1):e92-e102. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00295. Epub 2022 Dec 6.