• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当完美契合可能带来不良后果时。

When a good fit can be bad.

作者信息

Pitt Mark A., Myung In Jae

机构信息

Dept of Psychology, Ohio State University, 1885 Neil Avenue, 43210-1222, Columbus, Ohio, USA

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):421-425. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01964-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01964-2
PMID:12413575
Abstract

How should we select among computational models of cognition? Although it is commonplace to measure how well each model fits the data, this is insufficient. Good fits can be misleading because they can result from properties of the model that have nothing to do with it being a close approximation to the cognitive process of interest (e.g. overfitting). Selection methods are introduced that factor in these properties when measuring fit. Their success in outperforming standard goodness-of-fit measures stems from a focus on measuring the generalizability of a model's data-fitting abilities, which should be the goal of model selection.

摘要

我们应该如何在认知计算模型中进行选择?虽然测量每个模型与数据的拟合程度是很常见的做法,但这还不够。良好的拟合可能会产生误导,因为它们可能源于模型的某些属性,而这些属性与它是否是对感兴趣的认知过程的近似无关(例如过拟合)。本文介绍了一些选择方法,这些方法在测量拟合时会考虑这些属性。它们在性能上优于标准拟合优度测量方法,这源于它们专注于测量模型数据拟合能力的可推广性,而这应该是模型选择的目标。

相似文献

1
When a good fit can be bad.当完美契合可能带来不良后果时。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):421-425. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01964-2.
2
The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection.模型选择中复杂性的重要性。
J Math Psychol. 2000 Mar;44(1):190-204. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1283.
3
Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance.从模型拟合个体表现与平均表现来推断认知过程的风险。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Jun;12(3):403-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03193784.
4
Flexibility versus generalizability in model selection.模型选择中的灵活性与通用性
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):29-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03196467.
5
Ability, breadth, and parsimony in computational models of higher-order cognition.高阶认知的计算模型中的能力、广度和简约性。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;32(8):1304-22. doi: 10.1080/03640210802455175.
6
Using parameter space partitioning to evaluate a model's qualitative fit.使用参数空间划分来评估模型的定性拟合度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):617-631. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1123-5.
7
An evaluation of a computational model of lexical access: comment on Dell et al. (1997).词汇通达计算模型的评估:对戴尔等人(1997年)的评论。
Psychol Rev. 2000 Jul;107(3):609-34. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.609.
8
Physical Activity and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: The Mediating Effect of Depressive Symptoms.老年人的身体活动与认知功能:抑郁症状的中介作用
J Neurosci Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;48(4):E2-E12. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000197.
9
Advanced diffusion models in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: Goodness of fit, relationships among diffusion parameters and comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion.头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的高级扩散模型:拟合优度、扩散参数之间的关系以及与动态对比增强灌注的比较
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb;36:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
Optimized approximation algorithm in neural networks without overfitting.神经网络中无过拟合的优化近似算法。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2008 Jun;19(6):983-95. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2007.915114.

引用本文的文献

1
Subcortical brain volumetric differences related to white matter lesion volume and cognition in healthy aging.与健康衰老过程中白质病变体积和认知相关的皮质下脑容量差异。
NPJ Aging. 2025 May 28;11(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41514-025-00234-z.
2
Discrimination of mnemonic similarity is associated with short-term and long-term memory precision.记忆相似性的辨别与短期和长期记忆的精确性相关。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct 21. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01648-y.
3
How do people build up visual memory representations from sensory evidence? Revisiting two classic models of choice.
人们如何根据感官证据构建视觉记忆表征?重新审视两种经典的选择模型。
J Math Psychol. 2023 Dec;117. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102805. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
4
Hybrid framework of fatigue: connecting motivational control and computational moderators to gamma oscillations.疲劳的混合框架:将动机控制和计算调节因素与伽马振荡联系起来。
Front Neuroergon. 2024 May 28;5:1375913. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1375913. eCollection 2024.
5
"Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.“盲目行动”:在视动适应过程中抑制明确的基于知识的学习的条件。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Aug;50(8):785-807. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001210. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
The Mathematical Modeling of the Host-Virus Interaction in Dengue Virus Infection: A Quantitative Study.登革病毒感染中宿主-病毒相互作用的数学建模:定量研究。
Viruses. 2024 Jan 31;16(2):216. doi: 10.3390/v16020216.
7
Designing optimal behavioral experiments using machine learning.使用机器学习设计最优行为实验。
Elife. 2024 Jan 23;13:e86224. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86224.
8
Formal theories clarify the complex: Generalizing a neural process account of the interaction of visual exploration and word learning in infancy.正式理论阐明了复杂性:将婴儿期视觉探索和词汇学习的神经过程解释推广。
Child Dev. 2023 Nov-Dec;94(6):1491-1510. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14023. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
9
Smartphone Distraction: Italian Validation of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS).智能手机分心:智能手机分心量表(SDS)的意大利验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;20(15):6509. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156509.
10
How much data do we need to estimate computational models of decision-making? The COMPASS toolbox.我们需要多少数据来估计决策的计算模型?COMPASS 工具箱。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2537-2548. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02165-7. Epub 2023 Jun 27.