Chandraratna P Anthony N, Brar Ramandeep, Vijayasekaran Sridhar, Chen Qiu Xiong, Niguse Gebeyehu T, Shaikh Yasmeen, Cho Heidi
Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles County, California, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Nov;15(11):1381-6. doi: 10.1067/mje.2002.125921.
The feasibility of hands-free transthoracic continuous determination of pulmonary artery (PA) diastolic pressure (PAD) and cardiac output (CO) by Doppler ultrasound has not been previously demonstrated. We developed a 2.5-MHz spherical transducer mounted in an external housing to permit steering in 360 degrees (Contison). The external housing was attached to the chest wall using an adhesive patch.
Fifty patients in the coronary care department who had PA catheters had Doppler ultrasound studies. The 2.5-MHz spherical transducer was placed at the left sternal border to permit imaging of the pulmonic valve and was attached to a commercial ultrasound machine. The PA was imaged and its diameter measured. The pulmonary flow velocity signal was recorded and the time velocity integral obtained. The CO was calculated as: CO = time velocity integral of the PA systolic flow velocity signal x pi diameter(2) divided by 4 x heart rate. The pulmonary regurgitation signal was then recorded and the end-diastolic velocity of the regurgitant signal was measured. Right atrial pressure was assessed from the jugular venous pressure or from the size and pulsatility of the inferior vena cava. The PADP was calculated as: PADP = 4 end-diastolic velocity of the regurgitant signal(2) + right atrial pressure. The CO, PADP, and pulmonary wedge pressure were recorded from the PA catheter immediately after the ultrasound studies. Serial data were obtained every half hour or 1 hour up to a maximum of 5 hours. Adequate Doppler signals were obtained in 43 patients.
There was a good correlation between the PADP by Doppler versus PA catheter (r = 0.90, standard error of the estimate = 3.3 mm Hg); PADP by Doppler versus PA wedge pressure (r = 0.88, standard error of the estimate = 3.7 mm Hg); and CO by Doppler versus PA catheter (r = 0.92, standard error of the estimate = 0.7 L/min).
The 2.5-MHz spherical transducer permitted accurate assessment of CO and PAD. This transducer could be of potential value in monitoring patients in the intensive care setting.
此前尚未证实通过多普勒超声进行免手持经胸连续测定肺动脉(PA)舒张压(PAD)和心输出量(CO)的可行性。我们开发了一种安装在外壳中的2.5兆赫球形换能器,以实现360度转向(Contison)。使用粘性贴片将外壳附着于胸壁。
冠心病监护病房中50例插有PA导管的患者接受了多普勒超声检查。将2.5兆赫球形换能器置于胸骨左缘以对肺动脉瓣进行成像,并连接到一台商用超声仪上。对肺动脉进行成像并测量其直径。记录肺血流速度信号并获得时间速度积分。CO计算如下:CO = 肺动脉收缩期血流速度信号的时间速度积分×π直径²÷4×心率。然后记录肺反流信号并测量反流信号的舒张末期速度。通过颈静脉压或下腔静脉的大小及搏动性评估右心房压力。PADP计算如下:PADP = 4×反流信号的舒张末期速度² + 右心房压力。超声检查后立即从PA导管记录CO、PADP和肺楔压。每半小时或1小时获取系列数据,最长持续5小时。43例患者获得了足够的多普勒信号。
多普勒测定的PADP与PA导管测定结果之间具有良好相关性(r = 0.90,估计标准误差 = 3.3毫米汞柱);多普勒测定的PADP与PA楔压之间(r = 0.88,估计标准误差 = 3.7毫米汞柱);以及多普勒测定的CO与PA导管测定结果之间(r = 0.92,估计标准误差 = 0.7升/分钟)。
2.5兆赫球形换能器可准确评估CO和PAD。该换能器在重症监护环境中监测患者可能具有潜在价值。