• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[结核病实验室中因交叉污染导致的假阳性培养结果]

[False-positive cultures due to cross contamination in tuberculosis laboratories].

作者信息

Ritacco V, López B, Paul R, Reniero A, Di Lonardo M, Casimir L, Togneri A, Kaufman S, Barrera L

机构信息

Servicio de Micobacterias, INEI ANLIS Carlos G. Malbrán, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 563, 1281 Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Rev Argent Microbiol. 2002 Jul-Sep;34(3):163-6.

PMID:12415899
Abstract

Fifteen episodes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis laboratory cross-contamination suspected between 1996 and 2001 at 6 laboratories in Buenos Aires City and suburbs were investigated by IS6110 RFLP. Thirteen episodes were confirmed. Even though BACTEC 460 produced the highest number of confirmed episodes in a single laboratory, the most extended one occurred while employing conventional culture procedures in solid medium. The double repetitive element-polymerase chain reaction (DRE-PCR) was applied to 8 of these episodes and produced concordant results with those of the RFLP. The DRE-PCR appears to be a valuable tool for the prompt identification of false positive cultures. The timely rectification of defects in laboratory protocols can avert false diagnoses of tuberculosis and unnecessary prolonged treatments.

摘要

1996年至2001年间,对布宜诺斯艾利斯市及郊区6家实验室疑似发生的15起结核分枝杆菌实验室交叉污染事件进行了IS6110限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)调查。其中13起事件得到确认。尽管BACTEC 460在单个实验室中产生的确认事件数量最多,但最广泛的交叉污染事件发生在使用固体培养基的传统培养程序时。对其中8起事件应用了双重复元件聚合酶链反应(DRE-PCR),其结果与RFLP结果一致。DRE-PCR似乎是快速鉴定假阳性培养物的有价值工具。及时纠正实验室操作规程中的缺陷可避免结核病的误诊和不必要的长期治疗。

相似文献

1
[False-positive cultures due to cross contamination in tuberculosis laboratories].[结核病实验室中因交叉污染导致的假阳性培养结果]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2002 Jul-Sep;34(3):163-6.
2
Rapid identification of laboratory contamination with Mycobacterium tuberculosis using variable number tandem repeat analysis.使用可变数目串联重复序列分析快速鉴定结核分枝杆菌的实验室污染情况。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):69-74. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.69-74.2001.
3
Mycobacterium tuberculosis typing: usefulness of DRE-PCR to confirm cross-contamination in the mycobacteriology laboratory of a general reference hospital for AIDS.结核分枝杆菌分型:DRE-PCR在一家艾滋病综合参考医院的分枝杆菌实验室中确认交叉污染的效用。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Feb;6(2):150-4.
4
[Case of laboratory cross-contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the broth-based culture system].[基于肉汤培养系统的结核分枝杆菌实验室交叉污染案例]
Kekkaku. 2007 Nov;82(11):825-9.
5
False-positive growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis attributable to laboratory contamination confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.经限制性片段长度多态性分析证实,结核分枝杆菌假阳性生长归因于实验室污染。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Sep;5(9):861-7.
6
Investigation of cross contamination in a Mycobacterium tuberculosis laboratory using IS6110 DNA fingerprinting.使用IS6110 DNA指纹技术对结核分枝杆菌实验室中的交叉污染进行调查。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998 May;2(5):425-9.
7
The use of variable-number tandem-repeat mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit typing to identify laboratory cross-contamination with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.使用可变数目串联重复序列分枝杆菌插入重复单元分型法来鉴定结核分枝杆菌实验室交叉污染。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 May;52(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.12.002.
8
A prospective, multicenter study of laboratory cross-contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures.一项关于结核分枝杆菌培养物实验室交叉污染的前瞻性多中心研究。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Nov;8(11):1260-3. doi: 10.3201/eid0811.020298.
9
[Cross-contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture in clinical laboratories].[临床实验室中结核分枝杆菌培养的交叉污染]
Kekkaku. 1999 Nov;74(11):777-88.
10
[False tuberculosis outbreak caused by specimen contamination in a micro-bacteriology laboratory: confirmation by molecular techniques].[微生物学实验室中因标本污染导致的假结核暴发:分子技术确认]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1997 Mar;15(3):144-6.