Suppr超能文献

口服和肌肉注射1,4 - 丁二磺酸腺苷蛋氨酸(SAMe)治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和耐受性:两项多中心研究中与丙咪嗪的比较

Efficacy and tolerability of oral and intramuscular S-adenosyl-L-methionine 1,4-butanedisulfonate (SAMe) in the treatment of major depression: comparison with imipramine in 2 multicenter studies.

作者信息

Delle Chiaie Roberto, Pancheri Paolo, Scapicchio Pierluigi

机构信息

III Clinica Psichiatrica La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Nov;76(5):1172S-6S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76/5.1172S.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe), a natural compound, is the most important methyl donor in the central nervous system. In several clinical trials, SAMe showed antidepressant activity.

OBJECTIVE

Two multicenter studies were conducted in patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode [baseline score on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) >or=18] to confirm the efficacy and safety of SAMe in the treatment of major depression. In the first study (MC3), 1600 mg SAMe/d was given orally; whereas, in the second study (MC4), 400 mg SAMe/d was given intramuscularly. In both studies, the effects of SAMe were compared with those of 150 mg imipramine/d given orally in a double-blind design.

DESIGN

In MC3, 143 patients received oral SAMe and 138 patients received imipramine for 6 wk. In MC4, 147 patients received SAMe intramuscularly and 148 patients received imipramine for 4 wk. In both studies the 2 main efficacy measures were the final HAM-D score and the percentage of responders to Clinical Global Impression at the endpoint. Secondary efficacy measures were the endpoint Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores and the percentage of responders, responders being those patients showing a decrease in HAM-D score of >or=50% from baseline.

RESULTS

In both studies, the results of SAMe and imipramine treatment did not differ significantly for any efficacy measure. However, significantly fewer adverse events were observed in the patients treated with SAMe.

CONCLUSIONS

The antidepressive efficacy of 1600 mg SAMe/d orally and 400 mg SAMe/d intramuscularly is comparable with that of 150 mg imipramine/d orally, but SAMe is significantly better tolerated.

摘要

背景

S-腺苷-L-蛋氨酸(SAMe)是一种天然化合物,是中枢神经系统中最重要的甲基供体。在多项临床试验中,SAMe显示出抗抑郁活性。

目的

开展两项多中心研究,纳入诊断为重度抑郁发作的患者[21项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)基线评分≥18],以确认SAMe治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和安全性。在第一项研究(MC3)中,口服给予1600 mg/d SAMe;而在第二项研究(MC4)中,肌肉注射给予400 mg/d SAMe。在两项研究中,均采用双盲设计将SAMe的效果与口服150 mg/d丙咪嗪的效果进行比较。

设计

在MC3中,143例患者接受口服SAMe,138例患者接受丙咪嗪治疗6周。在MC4中,147例患者接受SAMe肌肉注射,148例患者接受丙咪嗪治疗4周。在两项研究中,两个主要疗效指标为最终HAM-D评分和终点时临床总体印象改善者的百分比。次要疗效指标为终点时蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表评分及改善者的百分比,改善者是指HAM-D评分较基线降低≥50%的患者。

结果

在两项研究中,对于任何疗效指标,SAMe和丙咪嗪治疗的结果均无显著差异。然而,接受SAMe治疗的患者中观察到的不良事件明显较少。

结论

口服1600 mg/d SAMe和肌肉注射400 mg/d SAMe的抗抑郁疗效与口服150 mg/d丙咪嗪相当,但SAMe的耐受性明显更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验