Zekry Dina, Duyckaerts Charles, Belmin Joël, Geoffre Caroline, Moulias Robert, Hauw Jean-Jacques
Laboratoire de Neuropathologie Raymond Escourolle, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 47-83, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris, Cedex 13, France.
J Neurol. 2002 Nov;249(11):1529-34. doi: 10.1007/s00415-002-0883-1.
Clarifying the etiology of dementia is one of the most difficult diagnostic challenges, especially in the elderly. We examined the accuracy of clinical criteria to distinguish Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia associated with infarcts of the brain, either isolated (vascular dementia) or associated with degenerative lesions (mixed dementia). We carried out a prospective clinico-neuropathological study in a selected series of hospitalized patients. We evaluated the clinical aspects of 33 patients aged over 75 years by use of the criteria and scores of DSMIII, NINCDS-ADRDA, Loeb and Gandolfo, ADDTC and NINDS-AIREN and the Hachinski Ischemic Score. The neuropathological diagnosis was considered to be the gold standard. When comparing clinical criteria and neuropathology, the agreement was moderate for Hachinski's score (0.50) and Loeb's score (0.43) and substantial for the ADDTC (0.63) and the NINDS-AIREN (0.67). When mixed dementias were excluded, the agreement between all clinical criteria and scores and the pathological diagnosis rose to 0.88. Hachinski's score was the most sensitive (0.89) and the NINDS-AIREN the most specific (0.86) for the diagnosis of vascular dementia. In conclusion, all sets of clinical criteria distinguished pure AD from vascular dementia with a high accuracy whereas mixed dementia was clinically under-recognized. The NINDS-AIREN criteria were the most discriminating for the accurate identification of patients with mixed dementia.
明确痴呆的病因是最具挑战性的诊断难题之一,在老年人中尤为如此。我们研究了用于区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)与脑梗死相关痴呆(无论是孤立性的,即血管性痴呆,还是与退行性病变相关的,即混合性痴呆)的临床标准的准确性。我们对一系列选定的住院患者进行了一项前瞻性临床神经病理学研究。我们使用DSMIII、NINCDS - ADRDA、Loeb和Gandolfo、ADDTC以及NINDS - AIREN的标准和评分以及哈金斯基缺血评分,对33名75岁以上患者的临床情况进行了评估。神经病理学诊断被视为金标准。将临床标准与神经病理学进行比较时,哈金斯基评分(0.50)和Loeb评分(0.43)的一致性为中等,ADDTC(0.63)和NINDS - AIREN(0.67)的一致性为实质性。排除混合性痴呆后,所有临床标准和评分与病理诊断之间的一致性升至0.88。哈金斯基评分对血管性痴呆的诊断最敏感(0.89),NINDS - AIREN最具特异性(0.86)。总之,所有临床标准集都能以较高的准确性区分单纯AD与血管性痴呆,而混合性痴呆在临床上未得到充分认识。NINDS - AIREN标准在准确识别混合性痴呆患者方面最具鉴别力。