Chaves Márcia Lorena Fagundes, Camozzato Ana Luiza, Godinho Cláudia, Kochhann Renata, Schuh Artur, de Almeida Vanessa Lopes, Kaye Jeffrey
Alzheimer's Disease and Neurogeriatric Clinic, Neurology Service and Internal Medicine Department, UFRGS School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007 Jul-Sep;21(3):210-7. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31811ff2b4.
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and agreement analyses between Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and dementia diagnostic criteria (gold standard), Blessed Dementia Rating scale (BDRS), and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition, Revised (DSM III-R) criteria for severity. In a sample of 343 Southern Brazilian participants, CDR was consecutively assessed in 295 dementia patients (Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, and questionable) and 48 healthy elderly. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable Alzheimer disease and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherché et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) for probable vascular dementia were the gold standard. A battery of cognitive tests and the Mini Mental State Examination (as a screening test at study entry) were also applied. Sensitivity and specificity were obtained through contingency tables. Validity and reliability were measured through kappa coefficient, Kendall b, and percent agreement. CDR agreement among raters was demonstrated by percent agreement. Agreement to gold standard was good (kappa=0.75), as well as to the Blessed scale (kappa=0.73), and excellent to the DSM III-R (kappa=0.78). CDR detection of dementia among healthy elderly or questionable dementia was 86% and 80% sensitive, respectively, and 100% specific for both settings. In conclusion, agreement of CDR global score with the gold standard was good, and diagnostic values were high.
本研究的目的是确定临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)与痴呆诊断标准(金标准)、Blessed痴呆评定量表(BDRS)以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM III-R)严重程度标准之间的诊断价值及一致性分析。在343名巴西南部参与者的样本中,对295名痴呆患者(阿尔茨海默病、血管性痴呆及可疑病例)和48名健康老年人连续进行了CDR评估。可能的阿尔茨海默病的美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所/阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病协会(NINCDS-ADRDA)标准和可能的血管性痴呆的美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所及国际神经科学研究与教学协会(NINDS-AIREN)标准为金标准。还应用了一系列认知测试以及简易精神状态检查表(作为研究入组时的筛查测试)。通过列联表获得敏感性和特异性。通过kappa系数、肯德尔b系数和一致性百分比来衡量有效性和可靠性。评分者之间的CDR一致性通过一致性百分比来证明。与金标准的一致性良好(kappa=0.75),与Blessed量表的一致性也良好(kappa=0.73),与DSM III-R的一致性极佳(kappa=0.78)。CDR对健康老年人或可疑痴呆中痴呆的检测敏感性分别为86%和80%,在两种情况下特异性均为100%。总之,CDR总体评分与金标准的一致性良好,诊断价值较高。