• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华生选择任务中最优数据选择的定量模型。

A quantitative model of optimal data selection in Wason's selection task.

作者信息

Hattori Masasi

机构信息

College of Letters, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1241-72. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000053.

DOI:10.1080/02724980244000053
PMID:12420994
Abstract

The optimal data selection model proposed by Oaksford and Chater (1994) successfully formalized Wason's selection task (Wason, 1966). The model, however, involved some questionable assumptions and was also not sufficient as a model of the task because it could not provide quantitative predictions of the card selection frequencies. In this paper, the model was revised to provide quantitative fits to the data. The model can predict the selection frequencies of cards based on a selection tendency function (STF), or conversely, it enables the estimation of subjective probabilities from data. Past experimental data were first re-analysed based on the model. In Experiment 1, the superiority of the revised model was shown. However, when the relationship between antecedent and consequent was forced to deviate from the biconditional form, the model was not supported. In Experiment 2, it was shown that sufficient emphasis on probabilistic information can affect participants' performance. A detailed experimental method to sort participants by probabilistic strategies was introduced. Here, the model was supported by a subgroup of participants who used the probabilistic strategy. Finally, the results were discussed from the viewpoint of adaptive rationality.

摘要

奥克斯福德和查特(1994)提出的最优数据选择模型成功地将沃森的选择任务(沃森,1966)形式化。然而,该模型涉及一些有问题的假设,并且作为该任务的模型也不充分,因为它无法提供卡片选择频率的定量预测。在本文中,对该模型进行了修订以对数据进行定量拟合。该模型可以基于选择倾向函数(STF)预测卡片的选择频率,或者相反,它能够从数据中估计主观概率。首先基于该模型对过去的实验数据进行重新分析。在实验1中,展示了修订模型的优越性。然而,当前提和结果之间的关系被迫偏离双条件形式时,该模型得不到支持。在实验2中,表明对概率信息的充分强调会影响参与者的表现。介绍了一种按概率策略对参与者进行分类的详细实验方法。在此,该模型得到了使用概率策略的参与者子群体的支持。最后,从适应性合理性的角度对结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
A quantitative model of optimal data selection in Wason's selection task.华生选择任务中最优数据选择的定量模型。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1241-72. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000053.
2
Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task.替代前因、概率与沃森选择任务中谬误的抑制
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jul;55(3):799-818. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000497.
3
Deciding between accounts of the selection task: a reply to Oaksford (2002).关于选择任务各观点间的抉择:对奥克斯福德(2002年)的回应
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Aug;56(6):1079-88. doi: 10.1080/02724980245000034.
4
The abstract selection task: new data and an almost comprehensive model.摘要筛选任务:新数据与近乎全面的模型
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):680-703. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.680.
5
Data selection and natural sampling: probabilities do matter.数据选择与自然抽样:概率至关重要。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):143-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03196089.
6
The suppression of q card selections: evidence for deductive inference in Wason's selection task.对Q卡片选择的抑制:沃森选择任务中演绎推理的证据
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Nov;53(4):1224-42. doi: 10.1080/713755944.
7
Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.《贝叶斯理性:人类推理的概率方法》概要
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Feb;32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000284.
8
Do people reason on the Wason selection task? A new look at the data of Ball et al. (2003).人们在沃森选择任务中会进行推理吗?对鲍尔等人(2003年)的数据的重新审视。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):434-41. doi: 10.1080/17470210903398147.
9
Optimal data selection: revision, review, and reevaluation.优化数据选择:修订、审查和重新评估。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):289-318. doi: 10.3758/bf03196492.
10
Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?模型选择中的选择会影响最大似然分析吗?
Syst Biol. 2008 Feb;57(1):76-85. doi: 10.1080/10635150801898920.

引用本文的文献

1
A dependence detection heuristic in causal induction to handle nonbinary variables.一种用于因果归纳中处理非二元变量的依赖性检测启发式方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11638. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91051-7.
2
Bayesian inference for the information gain model.贝叶斯推断信息增益模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):297-309. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0057-5.
3
Negations and natural sampling in data selection: ecological versus heuristic explanations of matching bias.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jun;32(4):570-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03195848.
4
Optimal data selection: revision, review, and reevaluation.优化数据选择:修订、审查和重新评估。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):289-318. doi: 10.3758/bf03196492.
5
Data selection and natural sampling: probabilities do matter.数据选择与自然抽样:概率至关重要。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):143-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03196089.