Hayes Keith C, Wolfe Dalton L, Hsieh Jane T, Potter Patrick J, Krassioukov Andrei, Durham Carmen E
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Parkwood Hospital Site, St. Joseph's Health Care, 801 Commissioners Road E, London, Ontario N6C 5J1, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Nov;83(11):1612-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35101.
To determine the degree of association among indices of preserved sensation derived from quantitative sensory testing (QST), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and the clinical characteristics of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).
A controlled correlational study of diverse measures of preserved sensory function.
Regional SCI rehabilitation center in Ontario, Canada.
Thirty-three patients with incomplete SCI and 14 able-bodied controls.
Not applicable.
QST measures of perceptual threshold for temperature and vibration, American Spinal Injury Association sensory scores (light touch, pinprick), and tibial nerve SEPs.
There was a low degree of association (kappa) between QST results and sensory scores (|kappa|=.05-.44). QST measures yielded greater numbers of patients with SCI being classified as impaired, suggesting a greater sensitivity of QST to detect more subtle sensory deficits. QST measures of vibration threshold generally corresponded to the patients' SEP recordings. QST measures of modalities conveyed within the same tract were significantly (P<.05) correlated (|r|=.46-.84) in patients with SCI, but not in controls, whereas those modalities mediated by different pathways had lower and generally nonsignificant correlations (|r|=.05-.44) in both patients and controls.
The low degree of association between QST measures and sensory scores is likely attributable to measurement limitations of both assessments, as well as various neuroanatomic and neuropathologic factors. QST provides more sensitive detection of preserved sensory function than does standard clinical examination in patients with incomplete SCI.
确定源自定量感觉测试(QST)、体感诱发电位(SEP)的感觉保留指标与脊髓损伤(SCI)患者临床特征之间的关联程度。
对感觉功能保留的多种测量方法进行对照相关性研究。
加拿大安大略省的地区性SCI康复中心。
33例不完全性SCI患者和14名健全对照者。
不适用。
温度和振动感觉阈值的QST测量、美国脊髓损伤协会感觉评分(轻触觉、针刺觉)以及胫神经SEP。
QST结果与感觉评分之间的关联程度较低(kappa值)(|kappa| = 0.05 - 0.44)。QST测量显示更多SCI患者被归类为感觉受损,表明QST在检测更细微感觉缺陷方面具有更高的敏感性。振动阈值的QST测量通常与患者的SEP记录相对应。在SCI患者中,同一传导束内传递的感觉模式的QST测量显著相关(P < 0.05)(|r| = 0.46 - 0.84),但在对照者中不相关,而由不同通路介导的那些感觉模式在患者和对照者中相关性较低且通常无显著意义(|r| = 0.05 - 0.44)。
QST测量与感觉评分之间的低关联度可能归因于两种评估方法的测量局限性以及各种神经解剖和神经病理因素。在不完全性SCI患者中,QST比标准临床检查能更敏感地检测感觉功能保留情况。