• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界银行的创新市场。

The World Bank's innovation market.

作者信息

Wood Robert Chapman, Hamel Gary

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Nov;80(11):104-10, 112-3, 134.

PMID:12422794
Abstract

Large, tradition-bound organizations can make space for radical, low-cost (and therefore low-risk) innovations. Just ask executives at the World Bank. The story of this best practice begins in 1998, when a young new-products group at the international funding agency proposed holding an Innovation Marketplace to capture novel ideas within the Bank for alleviating poverty. The forum, which eventually was opened to external participants, let people informally present their antipoverty ideas to potential funding sources. Funders could move among hundreds of booths and evaluate proposals for, say, a program that would provide postdisaster reconstruction insurance in developing countries or a vaccination development initiative. The marketplace truncated the Bank's standard project-review processes, which often stretched to a year or more, and gave funders permission to make commitments in the tens of thousands of dollars, rather than in the tens of millions more typical of Bank-financed projects. The marketplace concept met with some skepticism at the beginning. Some senior executives at the Bank felt no group had the right to spend the agency's money without following its well-established resource allocations process. But the marketplace team believed an open process for allocating grants would produce more breakthrough ideas in the long run than a centralized one. In this article, the authors describe how the new-products team brainstormed to create a market for ideas, how it got senior management's support, and how it has expanded on the original concept for these innovation marketplaces. The program's success, they contend, offers hope both for the world's poor and for business leaders looking to find new ideas under the hard crust of corporate dogma, conformance, and bureaucracy.

摘要

大型的、受传统束缚的组织可以为激进的、低成本(因而低风险)的创新留出空间。问问世界银行的高管们就知道了。这个最佳实践的故事始于1998年,当时这家国际融资机构的一个年轻的新产品团队提议举办一个创新市场,以捕捉世行内部有关减轻贫困的新想法。这个论坛最终向外部参与者开放,让人们可以非正式地向潜在的资金来源介绍他们的扶贫想法。资助者可以穿梭于数百个展位之间,评估各种提案,比如一个为发展中国家提供灾后重建保险的项目,或者一项疫苗研发倡议。这个市场简化了世行通常长达一年或更长时间的标准项目审查流程,并允许资助者承诺提供数万美元的资金,而不是世行资助项目中更常见的数千万美元。市场概念一开始遭到了一些质疑。世行的一些高级管理人员认为,没有哪个团队有权在不遵循其既定资源分配流程的情况下动用该机构的资金。但市场团队认为,从长远来看,一个开放的拨款分配流程比集中式流程能产生更多突破性的想法。在本文中,作者描述了新产品团队如何集思广益来创建一个创意市场,如何获得高级管理层的支持,以及如何在这些创新市场的原始概念基础上进行拓展。他们认为,该项目的成功既为世界上的贫困人口带来了希望,也为那些希望在公司教条、合规和官僚主义的坚硬外壳下找到新想法的企业领导者带来了希望。

相似文献

1
The World Bank's innovation market.世界银行的创新市场。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Nov;80(11):104-10, 112-3, 134.
2
Ideas versus money: a conversation with Jean-Louis Sarbib. Interview by Philip Musgrove.理念与金钱:与让 - 路易·萨尔比的对话。菲利普·马斯格罗夫采访
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-341-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.341.
3
From spare change to real change. The social sector as beta site for business innovation.从零花钱到真正的变革。社会部门作为商业创新的试验场。
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 May-Jun;77(3):122-32, 210.
4
The innovation value chain.创新价值链。
Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Jun;85(6):121-30, 142.
5
Open-market innovation.开放式市场创新
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Oct;80(10):80-9, 129.
6
Building an innovation factory.打造一个创新工厂。
Harv Bus Rev. 2000 May-Jun;78(3):157-66, 217.
7
The discipline of innovation.创新学科
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 Nov-Dec;76(6):149-57.
8
[Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].[寄生虫学诊断试剂盒:哪些对照?]
Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):145-9.
9
Analysis of the World Bank's pharmaceutical lending.世界银行药品贷款分析。
Health Policy. 2007 Apr;81(1):102-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
10
Funding growth in an age of austerity.紧缩时代的资金增长。
Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Jul-Aug;82(7-8):76-84, 186.