• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估化学品急性皮肤刺激性的Episkin试验方案的优化:欧洲替代方法验证中心预验证研究的后续工作

Refinement of the Episkin protocol for the assessment of acute skin irritation of chemicals: follow-up to the ECVAM prevalidation study.

作者信息

Portes P, Grandidier M-H, Cohen C, Roguet R

机构信息

L'Oreal Recherche, Aulnay sous Bois, France.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 2002 Dec;16(6):765-70. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00090-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00090-5
PMID:12423661
Abstract

The Episkin model took part in the prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation of chemicals, which was carried out during 1999 and 2000. This prevalidation study was co-ordinated and supported by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM). During Phase 1 and Phase 2 of this study, reproducibility and transferability of the method were verified. Unfortunately, the performance of the method in terms of predictive ability was considered insufficient, due to a low specificity. In order to improve the performance of the Episkin method, the existing protocol was refined. This refinement consisted in reducing the exposure time of epidermis with chemicals. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the new method were 70, 80 and 75%, respectively, thus meeting the acceptance criteria as defined by the Management Team. The Episkin method is now ready to enter a validation study of in vitro tests for acute skin irritation.

摘要

Episkin模型参与了1999年至2000年期间开展的化学品急性皮肤刺激性体外试验的预验证研究。该预验证研究由欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)协调并提供支持。在本研究的第1阶段和第2阶段,对该方法的重现性和转移性进行了验证。遗憾的是,由于特异性较低,该方法在预测能力方面的表现被认为不足。为了提高Episkin方法的性能,对现有方案进行了改进。这种改进包括缩短表皮与化学品的接触时间。新方法的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为70%、80%和75%,从而达到了管理团队规定的验收标准。Episkin方法现已准备好进入化学品急性皮肤刺激性体外试验的验证研究。

相似文献

1
Refinement of the Episkin protocol for the assessment of acute skin irritation of chemicals: follow-up to the ECVAM prevalidation study.用于评估化学品急性皮肤刺激性的Episkin试验方案的优化:欧洲替代方法验证中心预验证研究的后续工作
Toxicol In Vitro. 2002 Dec;16(6):765-70. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00090-5.
2
A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. results and evaluation by the Management Team.急性皮肤刺激性体外试验的预验证研究。管理团队的结果与评估。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2001 Feb;15(1):57-93. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(01)00002-9.
3
The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test.欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)关于急性皮肤刺激性体外试验的国际验证研究:关于EPISKIN和EpiDerm试验以及皮肤完整性功能测试有效性的报告。
Altern Lab Anim. 2007 Dec;35(6):559-601. doi: 10.1177/026119290703500614.
4
The EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests--an assessment of the performance of the optimised test.即将开展的欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)体外皮肤刺激试验验证研究的EpiDerm试验方案——优化试验性能评估
Altern Lab Anim. 2005 Aug;33(4):351-67. doi: 10.1177/026119290503300408.
5
Optimisation of the EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests.针对即将开展的欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)体外皮肤刺激试验验证研究,优化表皮模型(EpiDerm)试验方案。
ALTEX. 2004;21(3):107-14.
6
Follow-up to the ECVAM prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods Skin Irritation Task Force report 2.欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)关于急性皮肤刺激性体外试验预验证研究的后续报告。欧洲替代方法验证中心皮肤刺激特别工作组报告2。
Altern Lab Anim. 2002 Jan-Feb;30(1):109-29. doi: 10.1177/026119290203000110.
7
The in vitro skin irritation of chemicals: optimisation of the EPISKIN prediction model within the framework of the ECVAM validation process.化学物质的体外皮肤刺激性:在欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)验证过程框架内对EPISKIN预测模型的优化
Altern Lab Anim. 2005 Aug;33(4):329-49. doi: 10.1177/026119290503300403.
8
Assessment of human epidermal model LabCyte EPI-MODEL for in vitro skin irritation testing according to European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)-validated protocol.根据欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)验证的方案,对用于体外皮肤刺激性测试的人体表皮模型LabCyte EPI-MODEL进行评估。
J Toxicol Sci. 2009 Jun;34(3):327-34. doi: 10.2131/jts.34.327.
9
ECVAM's activities in validating alternative tests for skin corrosion and irritation.欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)在验证皮肤腐蚀性和刺激性替代测试方面的活动。
Altern Lab Anim. 2002 Dec;30 Suppl 2:61-7. doi: 10.1177/026119290203002S09.
10
Assessment of the skin irritation potential of chemicals by using the SkinEthic reconstructed human epidermal model and the common skin irritation protocol evaluated in the ECVAM skin irritation validation study.通过使用SkinEthic重建人表皮模型和在欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)皮肤刺激验证研究中评估的常见皮肤刺激方案来评估化学品的皮肤刺激潜力。
Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Aug;34(4):393-406. doi: 10.1177/026119290603400407.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures: The Bridge between In Vitro and In Vivo Models.三维细胞培养:体外和体内模型之间的桥梁。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 27;24(15):12046. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512046.
2
Improved Tool for Predicting Skin Irritation on Reconstructed Human Epidermis Models Based on Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.基于电化学阻抗谱的重建人体表皮模型皮肤刺激性预测改进工具。
Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;13(2):162. doi: 10.3390/bios13020162.
3
Skin Toxicity Assessment of Silver Nanoparticles in a 3D Epidermal Model Compared to 2D Keratinocytes.
与 2D 角质形成细胞相比,3D 表皮模型中银纳米颗粒的皮肤毒性评估。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Dec 9;14:9707-9719. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S225451. eCollection 2019.
4
[Study on feasibility of HaCaT epidermal model as an alternative to skin irritation ].[以HaCaT表皮模型替代皮肤刺激性试验的可行性研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 15;31(10):1262-1266. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201705031.
5
Genetic toxicity assessment of engineered nanoparticles using a 3D in vitro skin model (EpiDerm™).使用3D体外皮肤模型(EpiDerm™)对工程纳米颗粒进行遗传毒性评估。
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2016 Sep 9;13(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0161-5.
6
Artificial skin in perspective: concepts and applications.展望人工皮肤:概念与应用。
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011 Feb;24(1):35-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2010.00786.x. Epub 2010 Nov 9.