Kalenak A, Morehouse C A
JAMA. 1975 Dec 15;234(11):1143-5.
Controversy exists on the relationship of knee ligament stability to knee injuries. Subjective evaluation of joint tightness or looseness has been proposed as a criterion for prescribing selective corrective strengthening or stretching exercises. Biomechanical studies of knee ligament stability were performed on 401 college football players from 1969 to 1971. Forty-three knee ligament injuries occurred during this period of time, 19 (44.2%) in "loose-jointed" players and 24 (55.8%) in "tight-jointed" players. Joint laxity tests were performed on 72 college football players; the distribution of college football players failing to perform each of the tests was quite different from that reported for professional football players. There was no relationship between the subjective joint laxity tests and the objective biomechanical tests of knee ligament stability. We conclude that it is not possible to predict knee injuries by subjective evaluations of joint laxity or by objective biomechanical knee ligament evaluations and that exercise programs based on subjective studies are therefore not sound.
关于膝关节韧带稳定性与膝关节损伤之间的关系存在争议。有人提出,对关节松紧度的主观评估可作为规定选择性矫正性强化或拉伸练习的标准。1969年至1971年期间,对401名大学橄榄球运动员进行了膝关节韧带稳定性的生物力学研究。在此期间发生了43例膝关节韧带损伤,其中19例(44.2%)发生在“关节松弛”的运动员中,24例(55.8%)发生在“关节紧绷”的运动员中。对72名大学橄榄球运动员进行了关节松弛度测试;未能通过每项测试的大学橄榄球运动员的分布情况与职业橄榄球运动员的报告情况有很大不同。主观关节松弛度测试与膝关节韧带稳定性的客观生物力学测试之间没有关系。我们得出结论,通过对关节松弛度的主观评估或通过膝关节韧带的客观生物力学评估来预测膝关节损伤是不可能的,因此基于主观研究的运动计划是不合理的。