Waldén Markus, Krosshaug Tron, Bjørneboe John, Andersen Thor Einar, Faul Oliver, Hägglund Martin
Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Football Research Group, Linköping, Sweden.
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;49(22):1452-60. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094573. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Current knowledge on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury mechanisms in male football players is limited.
To describe ACL injury mechanisms in male professional football players using systematic video analysis.
We assessed videos from 39 complete ACL tears recorded via prospective professional football injury surveillance between 2001 and 2011. Five analysts independently reviewed all videos to estimate the time of initial foot contact with the ground and the time of ACL tear. We then analysed all videos according to a structured format describing the injury circumstances and lower limb joint biomechanics.
Twenty-five injuries were non-contact, eight indirect contact and six direct contact injuries. We identified three main categories of non-contact and indirect contact injury situations: (1) pressing (n=11), (2) re-gaining balance after kicking (n=5) and (3) landing after heading (n=5). The fourth main injury situation was direct contact with the injured leg or knee (n=6). Knee valgus was frequently seen in the main categories of non-contact and indirect contact playing situations (n=11), but a dynamic valgus collapse was infrequent (n=3). This was in contrast to the tackling-induced direct contact situations where a knee valgus collapse occurred in all cases (n=3).
Eighty-five per cent of the ACL injuries in male professional football players resulted from non-contact or indirect contact mechanisms. The most common playing situation leading to injury was pressing followed by kicking and heading. Knee valgus was frequently seen regardless of the playing situation, but a dynamic valgus collapse was rare.
目前关于男性足球运动员前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤机制的知识有限。
通过系统的视频分析描述男性职业足球运动员的ACL损伤机制。
我们评估了2001年至2011年间通过前瞻性职业足球损伤监测记录的39例完全ACL撕裂的视频。五名分析人员独立审查所有视频,以估计首次足部接触地面的时间和ACL撕裂的时间。然后,我们根据描述损伤情况和下肢关节生物力学的结构化格式分析所有视频。
25例损伤为非接触性损伤,8例为间接接触性损伤,6例为直接接触性损伤。我们确定了非接触性和间接接触性损伤情况的三个主要类别:(1)挤压(n = 11),(2)踢球后重新获得平衡(n = 5)和(3)头球后落地(n = 5)。第四种主要损伤情况是受伤腿部或膝盖的直接接触(n = 6)。在非接触性和间接接触性比赛情况的主要类别中经常出现膝外翻(n = 11),但动态外翻塌陷很少见(n = 3)。这与铲球引起的直接接触情况形成对比,在所有情况下都发生了膝外翻塌陷(n = 3)。
男性职业足球运动员中85%的ACL损伤是由非接触或间接接触机制引起的。导致损伤最常见的比赛情况是挤压,其次是踢球和头球。无论比赛情况如何,膝外翻都很常见,但动态外翻塌陷很少见。