Suppr超能文献

当前使用的液体雾化装置的设计原理。

Design principles of liquid nebulization devices currently in use.

作者信息

Rau Joseph L

机构信息

Cardiopulmonary Care Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3088, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2002 Nov;47(11):1257-75; discussion 1275-8.

Abstract

Liquid nebulization is a common method of medical aerosol generation. Nebulizers are of 2 types: jet (or pneumatic) small-volume nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer. Jet nebulizers are based on the venturi principle, whereas ultrasonic nebulizers use the converse piezoelectric effect to convert alternating current to high-frequency acoustic energy. Important variables for both types of nebulizer are treatment time required, particle size produced, and aerosol drug output. There are several advantages to jet nebulization, including that effective use requires only simple, tidal breathing, and that dose modification and dose compounding are possible. Disadvantages include the length of treatment time and equipment size. Design modifications to the constant-output nebulizer have resulted in breath-enhanced, open-vent nebulizers such as the Pari LC Plus and the dosimetric AeroEclipse. Ultrasonic nebulizers generally have a higher output rate than jet nebulizers, but a larger average particle size. Ultrasonic nebulizers can also substantially increase reservoir solution temperature, the opposite of jet nebulizer cooling. Drug concentration in the reservoir does not increase with ultrasonic nebulization, as it does with jet nebulization. Ultrasonic nebulizers have the same advantages as jet nebulizers. Ultrasonic nebulizers are more expensive and fragile than jet nebulizers, may cause drug degradation, and do not nebulize suspensions well. Neither type of nebulizer meets the criteria for an ideal inhaler: efficient and quick dose delivery with reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and no ambient contamination by lost aerosol.

摘要

液体雾化是产生医用气雾剂的常用方法。雾化器有两种类型:喷射式(或气动)小容量雾化器和超声雾化器。喷射式雾化器基于文丘里原理,而超声雾化器利用逆压电效应将交流电转换为高频声能。这两种雾化器的重要变量包括所需的治疗时间、产生的颗粒大小和气雾剂药物输出量。喷射式雾化有几个优点,包括有效使用仅需简单的潮式呼吸,且可以进行剂量调整和剂量复合。缺点包括治疗时间长和设备体积大。对恒量输出雾化器的设计改进产生了呼吸增强型开放式通气雾化器,如帕里LC Plus和剂量测定型AeroEclipse。超声雾化器通常比喷射式雾化器的输出率更高,但平均颗粒尺寸更大。超声雾化器还会大幅提高储液器溶液温度,这与喷射式雾化器使溶液冷却相反。超声雾化时储液器中的药物浓度不会像喷射式雾化那样增加。超声雾化器与喷射式雾化器有相同的优点。超声雾化器比喷射式雾化器更昂贵且更易损坏,可能导致药物降解,并且对混悬液的雾化效果不佳。这两种雾化器都不符合理想吸入器的标准:高效、快速给药且具有可重复性、成本效益,且不会因气溶胶逸出而造成环境污染。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验