• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年抑郁量表的口头施测与书面施测

Oral versus written administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale.

作者信息

Cannon B J, Thaler T, Roos S

机构信息

Marywood University, Scranton, Pennsylvania 18509, USA.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2002 Nov;6(4):418-22. doi: 10.1080/1360786021000022930.

DOI:10.1080/1360786021000022930
PMID:12425776
Abstract

Forty-four female nursing home residents completed the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) twice, using both oral and written administration formats. Presentation was counterbalanced. The Mini-Mental State Exam and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale were administered to each participant between the GDS administrations. All testing was completed within one session. Test-retest reliability analysis revealed a significant correlation between oral and written administrations for higher cognitive functioning participants, but no correlation for impaired participants. Therefore, the use of the GDS in a cognitively impaired elderly population is questioned. Additionally, oral versus written administration formats were found to be not equivalent in the higher functioning group.

摘要

44名女性养老院居民使用口头和书面两种施测形式,两次完成老年抑郁量表(GDS)测试。施测形式进行了平衡处理。在两次GDS施测之间,对每位参与者进行简易精神状态检查表和马蒂斯痴呆评定量表测试。所有测试均在一次测试过程中完成。重测信度分析显示,认知功能较高的参与者在口头和书面施测之间存在显著相关性,但认知受损的参与者之间不存在相关性。因此,对于认知受损的老年人群体使用GDS量表受到质疑。此外,还发现对于功能较高的群体,口头施测和书面施测形式并不等效。

相似文献

1
Oral versus written administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale.老年抑郁量表的口头施测与书面施测
Aging Ment Health. 2002 Nov;6(4):418-22. doi: 10.1080/1360786021000022930.
2
[Reliability and validity of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia in an elderly Turkish population].[康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表在土耳其老年人群中的信度和效度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2003 Winter;14(4):263-71.
3
Correlates of depression in cognitively impaired hospitalized elderly referred for neuropsychological assessment.因神经心理评估而住院的认知障碍老年患者中抑郁症的相关因素。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1996 Oct;18(5):713-23. doi: 10.1080/01688639608408294.
4
Is the geriatric depression scale a reliable screening tool for depressive symptoms in elderly patients with cognitive impairment?老年抑郁量表是否可作为认知障碍老年患者抑郁症状的可靠筛查工具?
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;24(6):556-62. doi: 10.1002/gps.2154.
5
Depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment and functional impairment in a rural elderly population in India: a Hindi version of the geriatric depression scale (GDS-H).印度农村老年人口的抑郁症状、认知障碍和功能障碍:老年抑郁量表印地语版(GDS-H)
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;14(10):807-20.
6
Accuracy of the 15-item geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) in a community sample of the oldest old.15项老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)在高龄老年人社区样本中的准确性。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;18(1):63-6. doi: 10.1002/gps.773.
7
Detecting depression in the aged: is there concordance between screening tools and the perceptions of nursing home staff and residents? A pilot study in a rural aged care facility.检测老年人的抑郁症:筛查工具与养老院工作人员及居民的认知之间是否存在一致性?一项针对农村老年护理机构的试点研究。
Aust J Rural Health. 2007 Aug;15(4):252-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00901.x.
8
The Geriatric Depression Scale should be shortened: results of Rasch analysis.老年抑郁量表应缩短:拉施分析结果
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;20(8):783-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.1360.
9
The reliability and validity of the collateral source version of the Geriatric Depression Rating Scale administered by telephone.通过电话进行的老年抑郁评定量表旁系信息源版本的信度和效度。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;12(3):288-94.
10
Cognitive and psychiatric predictors of medical treatment adherence among older adults in primary care clinics.基层医疗诊所中老年患者药物治疗依从性的认知和精神科预测因素
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;22(1):55-60. doi: 10.1002/gps.1653.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Adolescent Depression Screening Using Orally Administered Versus Written Self-Report Scores.口服与书面自我报告分数用于青少年抑郁症筛查的比较。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251374583. doi: 10.1177/21501319251374583. Epub 2025 Sep 15.