Musahl Volker, Burkart Andreas, Debski Richard E, Van Scyoc Andrew, Fu Freddie H, Woo Savio L-Y
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(9):968-73. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.36110.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction performed with an active robotic system.
Cadaveric analysis.
A reference screw containing 4 fiducials was placed in the femur and tibia of 13 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. A preoperative plan was developed using images from 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions of the knee. The active robotic system then drilled the tunnels. The location and direction of each planned tunnel in the femur and tibia were determined from the preoperative plan. To compare these parameters postoperatively, a mechanical digitizer and a tunnel plug were used. The deviation in location and direction between the planned and drilled tunnel was determined.
In preliminary trials, the tibial tunnel was located inaccurately because slippage of the drill bit occurred on the bone at the start of tunnel drilling. This was minimized by decreasing the feed rate of the robot by 75%. For the remaining 10 knees, deviations with respect to the preoperative plan were found of 2.0 +/- 1.2 mm and 1.1 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees for the intra- articular tibial tunnel location and direction, respectively. For the femur, the deviations were 1.3 +/- 0.9 mm for the tunnel location (intra-articular) and 1.0 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees for the tunnel direction.
The active robotic system is highly accurate for tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction, meaning that the robot drills the tunnels very close to the surgeon's plan. Comparison to a control group of surgeons could not be made because no preoperative plan is usually created in traditional surgery. However, accuracy values in this study were found to be below the values for precision of repeated tunnel placements reported in the literature.
本研究的目的是评估使用主动式机器人系统进行前交叉韧带重建时隧道定位的准确性。
尸体分析。
在13个新鲜冷冻尸体膝关节的股骨和胫骨中放置一个包含4个基准点的参考螺钉。使用膝关节三维计算机断层扫描重建图像制定术前计划。然后主动式机器人系统钻出隧道。根据术前计划确定股骨和胫骨中每个计划隧道的位置和方向。为了术后比较这些参数,使用了机械数字化仪和隧道塞。确定计划隧道和钻出隧道之间的位置和方向偏差。
在初步试验中,胫骨隧道定位不准确,因为在隧道钻孔开始时钻头在骨上发生滑动。通过将机器人的进给速度降低75%,这种情况得到了最小化。对于其余10个膝关节,关节内胫骨隧道位置和方向相对于术前计划的偏差分别为2.0±1.2毫米和1.1°±0.7°。对于股骨,关节内隧道位置的偏差为1.3±0.9毫米,隧道方向的偏差为1.0°±0.6°。
主动式机器人系统在前交叉韧带重建过程中隧道定位非常准确,这意味着机器人钻出的隧道非常接近外科医生的计划。由于传统手术中通常不制定术前计划,因此无法与一组外科医生进行对照比较。然而,本研究中的准确性值低于文献中报道的重复隧道放置精度值。