Fernández-Dols José-Miguel, Carrera Pilar, Russell James A
Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2002 Nov;5(2):119-24. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600005898.
Observers are remarkably consistent in attributing particular emotions to particular facial expressions, at least in Western societies. Here, we suggest that this consistency is an instance of the fundamental attribution error. We therefore hypothesized that a small variation in the procedure of the recognition study, which emphasizes situational information, would change the participants' attributions. In two studies, participants were asked to judge whether a prototypical "emotional facial expression" was more plausibly associated with a social-communicative situation (one involving communication to another person) or with an equally emotional but nonsocial, situation. Participants were found more likely to associate each facial display with the social than with the nonsocial situation. This result was found across all emotions presented (happiness, fear, disgust, anger, and sadness) and for both Spanish and Canadian participants.
至少在西方社会,观察者在将特定情绪归因于特定面部表情时表现出显著的一致性。在此,我们认为这种一致性是基本归因错误的一个例子。因此,我们假设,在强调情境信息的识别研究程序中进行微小变化,会改变参与者的归因。在两项研究中,要求参与者判断一个典型的“情绪面部表情”更有可能与社交沟通情境(一种涉及与他人交流的情境)还是与同样情绪化但非社交的情境相关联。结果发现,参与者更倾向于将每个面部表情与社交情境而非非社交情境联系起来。在呈现的所有情绪(快乐、恐惧、厌恶、愤怒和悲伤)中以及西班牙和加拿大的参与者中均发现了这一结果。