Chiu Thomas T W, Lam Tai-Hing, Hedley Anthony J
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom.
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Nov;16(7):772-9. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr552oa.
To describe the maximal isometric neck muscle strength in healthy Chinese volunteers, in six different directions, as measured by a Multi Cervical Rehabilitation Unit.
A standardized cross-sectional observational study.
A university rehabilitation unit.
Ninety-one healthy volunteers aged 20-84.
During the measurement the subject was instructed to do three consecutive steady contractions as hard as possible, with a 10-second rest in between each contraction and a 2-minute rest between different directions. The peak isometric strength for each of the six directions (flexion, extension, lateral flexions, protraction and retraction) was calculated.
No significant difference was found in muscle strength between different age groups. Isometric muscle strength in the direction of right lateral flexion was significantly greater than that to the left in men (p = 0.030), but no difference was found in women (p = 0.297). Isometric strength in all directions in men was 1.2-1.7 times that in women (all p < 0.028). Correlations between physical measurements (height and weight) and strength values were all insignificant in both genders.
Men have approximately 20-70% greater isometric neck muscle strength than women. Both men and women can maintain high levels of cervical muscle strength in six different directions up to their seventh decade. There is no significant correlation between physical measurements and isometric neck muscle strength.
通过多颈椎康复单元测量,描述健康中国志愿者在六个不同方向上的最大等长颈部肌肉力量。
标准化横断面观察性研究。
大学康复单元。
91名年龄在20 - 84岁的健康志愿者。
测量过程中,受试者被要求尽可能用力地连续进行三次稳定收缩,每次收缩之间休息10秒,不同方向之间休息2分钟。计算六个方向(前屈、后伸、侧屈、前伸和后缩)各自的峰值等长力量。
不同年龄组之间肌肉力量未发现显著差异。男性右侧侧屈方向的等长肌肉力量显著大于左侧(p = 0.030),但女性未发现差异(p = 0.297)。男性所有方向的等长力量是女性的1.2 - 1.7倍(所有p < 0.028)。身体测量指标(身高和体重)与力量值之间的相关性在两性中均不显著。
男性的等长颈部肌肉力量比女性大约大20% - 70%。男性和女性在六个不同方向上都能保持高水平的颈部肌肉力量直至七十多岁。身体测量指标与等长颈部肌肉力量之间无显著相关性。