Cagnie Barbara, Cools Ann, De Loose Veerle, Cambier Dirk, Danneels Lieven
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.776.
To determine the intra- and interrater reliability of the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer to measure the maximal isometric strength of the cervical flexors and extensors, to develop an age- and sex-based normative database in a healthy population, and to evaluate the differences in neck strength between women with chronic neck pain and healthy controls.
Cross-sectional.
Physical and rehabilitation medicine department.
Ninety-six healthy volunteers (4 age groups: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59y; each consisting of 12 men and 12 women) and 30 women with chronic neck pain.
Not applicable.
Peak isometric strength of the cervical muscles was tested for flexion and extension by using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer. The intra- and interrater reliability of the protocol was evaluated in 12 volunteers.
The reliability for strength was high for both flexion and extension (intraclass correlation coefficient, .92-.96). The mean peak torque for flexion and extension was significantly higher in men (24Nm, 36.4Nm, respectively) compared with women (16.6Nm, 26.5Nm, respectively) (P<.001). Peak torque production for extension was significantly lower in the patient group (22.3Nm) compared with the healthy female control group (26.5Nm) (P=.003). No significant differences in flexion strength between patient and female control group were found.
Results show a high degree of intra- and interrater reliability in measuring isometric neck muscle strength when using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer. The use of normative data for neck strength when evaluating patients with neck disorders needs to take sex into account. The current study has shown that women with chronic neck pain have lower neck muscle strength in extension than the healthy female group.
确定Biodex等速测力计测量颈椎屈肌和伸肌最大等长肌力时的评分者内及评分者间信度,在健康人群中建立基于年龄和性别的规范数据库,并评估慢性颈痛女性与健康对照者颈部力量的差异。
横断面研究。
物理与康复医学科。
96名健康志愿者(4个年龄组:20 - 29岁、30 - 39岁、40 - 49岁、50 - 59岁;每组包括12名男性和12名女性)和30名慢性颈痛女性。
不适用。
使用Biodex等速测力计测试颈椎肌肉屈伸时的等长肌力峰值。在12名志愿者中评估该方案的评分者内及评分者间信度。
屈伸力量的信度均较高(组内相关系数,0.92 - 0.96)。男性屈伸的平均峰值扭矩(分别为24 Nm、36.4 Nm)显著高于女性(分别为16.6 Nm、26.5 Nm)(P < 0.001)。患者组伸肌的峰值扭矩产生(22.3 Nm)显著低于健康女性对照组(26.5 Nm)(P = 0.003)。患者组与女性对照组之间在屈肌力量上未发现显著差异。
结果表明,使用Biodex等速测力计测量等长颈部肌肉力量时,评分者内及评分者间具有高度信度。在评估颈部疾病患者时,使用颈部力量的规范数据需要考虑性别因素。当前研究表明,慢性颈痛女性的颈部伸肌力量低于健康女性组。