Education and Debate: WHO's management: struggling to transform a "fossilised bureaucracy".
作者信息
Yamey Gavin
机构信息
BMJ Unified, London WC1H 9JR.
出版信息
BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1170-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1170.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Education and Debate: WHO's management: struggling to transform a "fossilised bureaucracy".教育与辩论：世卫组织的管理：努力变革一个“僵化的官僚机构”
BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1170-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1170.
2
WHO's mandate: a damaging reinterpretation is taking place.世界卫生组织的使命：正在发生一种有害的重新诠释。
Lancet. 2002 Sep 28;360(9338):960-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11117-2.
3
An organizational analysis of the World Health Organization: narrowing the gap between promise and performance.世界卫生组织的组织分析：缩小承诺与绩效之间的差距
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Mar;40(6):731-42. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00300-i.
4
WHO in crisis.处于危机中的世界卫生组织。
BMJ. 1994 Nov 26;309(6966):1424-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1424.
5
Have the latest reforms reversed WHO's decline?最新的改革扭转了世界卫生组织的衰落吗？
BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1107-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1107.
6
WHO's special programmes: undermining from above.世界卫生组织的特别规划：自上而下的破坏。
BMJ. 1995 Jan 21;310(6973):178-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.178a.
7
WHO's slow road to funding reform.世界卫生组织资金改革的漫长之路。
Science. 1998 May 22;280(5367):1187-8. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5367.1187.
8
Allocating the WHO's resources rationally. One cheer for the who's proposed changes in regional budgets?合理分配世界卫生组织的资源。对世界卫生组织提议的区域预算变动该给予多少肯定呢？
BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1403-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1403.
9
WHO reform: a personal perspective.
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Aug;34(3):481-5. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.23.
10
WHO's programme budget since 1980: some lessons for the 1984-85 biennium.
WHO Chron. 1983;37(2):43-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Enacting a depoliticised alterity: law and traditional medicine at the World Health Organization.塑造一种去政治化的他者性：世界卫生组织中的法律与传统医学
Int J Law Context. 2022 Dec;18(4):476-498. doi: 10.1017/S1744552322000143. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
How is WHO responding to global public health threats?世界卫生组织如何应对全球公共卫生威胁？
PLoS Med. 2007 May;4(5):e197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040197.
3
WHO responds.世界卫生组织做出回应。
BMJ. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):217-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7382.217.
4
Electing WHO's next leader.选举世界卫生组织的下一任领导人。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1251-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1251.
本文引用的文献
1
UN inspectorate gives WHO administration a mixed review.
Lancet. 2002 Jan 26;359(9303):329. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07562-1.
2
World Health Report 2000: how it removes equity from the agenda for public health monitoring and policy.《2000年世界卫生报告》：它如何将公平性从公共卫生监测与政策议程中移除。
BMJ. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):678-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.678.
3
"The worst of both worlds": the management reform of the World Health Organization.“两个世界中最糟糕的情况”：世界卫生组织的管理改革
Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(2):415-38. doi: 10.2190/XE6N-XDKK-XY4C-57GV.
4
Science or marketing at WHO? A commentary on 'World Health 2000'.世界卫生组织是基于科学还是营销？对《2000年世界卫生状况》的评论
Health Econ. 2001 Mar;10(2):93-100. doi: 10.1002/hec.594.
5
The WHO: change or die.世界卫生组织：不改变就灭亡。
BMJ. 1995 Mar 4;310(6979):543-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6979.543.
6
WHO at country level--a little impact, no strategy.世界卫生组织在国家层面——影响甚微，缺乏战略。
BMJ. 1994 Dec 17;309(6969):1636-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6969.1636.
7
The World Health Organisation. The regions--too much power, too little effect.世界卫生组织。各区域——权力过大，成效过小。
BMJ. 1994 Dec 10;309(6968):1566-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6968.1566.
8
WHO in crisis.处于危机中的世界卫生组织。
BMJ. 1994 Nov 26;309(6966):1424-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1424.
Zotero 插件