Pentz Rebecca D, Lenzi Renato, Holmes Frankie, Khan Myrna M, Verschraegen Claire
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Road NE, B6200, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2002 Nov;10(8):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0374-z. Epub 2002 Aug 15.
Do not resuscitate (DNR) discussions are difficult for physicians and patients alike, resulting in DNR orders being written shortly before death. To understand the patients' point of view, interviews about the perception of DNR discussions were conducted as a pilot study. Fourteen patients with refractory cancer were asked to rank the favorability of DNR discussion scenarios on a Likert scale with 1 meaning most unfavorable and 7 meaning most favorable. The most favorable scenarios were assurance that pain will be controlled (6.9); assurance of nonabandonment (6.9); information about hospice care (6.6); and DNR discussion conducted by attending physician (6.6). The least favorably rated scenarios were delivery of recommendation by physician with whom patient had had no prior contact (1.8); presence of unknown medical personnel with physician (2.0); refusal of physician to answer questions (2.1); and agreement between physician and patient to discuss only positive aspects of patient's case (2.1). This study supports the importance to the patient of a supportive relationship with the attending physician who is both attuned to the need for comprehensive palliative care and is honest about the prognosis.
对于医生和患者而言,“不要复苏”(DNR)的讨论都很困难,这导致DNR医嘱往往在患者临终前不久才开具。为了解患者的观点,作为一项试点研究,我们开展了关于DNR讨论认知的访谈。14名晚期癌症患者被要求按照李克特量表对DNR讨论场景的好感度进行排序,1表示最不利,7表示最有利。最有利的场景包括:保证疼痛将得到控制(6.9);保证不会被放弃(6.9);关于临终关怀的信息(6.6);由主治医生进行DNR讨论(6.6)。好感度评分最低的场景包括:由之前未接触过患者的医生提出建议(1.8);医生身旁有陌生医务人员(2.0);医生拒绝回答问题(2.1);医生和患者达成只讨论患者病情积极方面的共识(2.1)。本研究支持了与主治医生建立支持性医患关系对患者的重要性,主治医生既要顺应全面姑息治疗的需求,又要如实告知预后情况。