Suppr超能文献

I型糖尿病患者死亡原因的可靠性。

Reliability of causes of death in persons with Type I diabetes.

作者信息

Mühlhauser I, Sawicki P T, Blank M, Overmann H, Richter B, Berger M

机构信息

Department of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, WHO-Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2002 Nov;45(11):1490-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0957-8. Epub 2002 Sep 19.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To compare causes of death assessed by a clinical review committee, the information given on death certificates, and ICD-codes provided by the State Documentation Office in deceased persons with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A cohort of 3674 patients were monitored for 10+/-3 (mean +/- SD) years. Vital status and end-stage diabetic complications were documented for 97%; 251 patients had died. Causes of death were assessed by a clinical review committee and compared to the information provided by death certificates and ICD-9 codes.

RESULTS

The review committee defined a leading cause of death in 94% of cases, whereas death certificates were available for 73% and ICD-codes for 79% of patients; 10% of death certificates could not be evaluated due to insufficient information. Diabetes was mentioned on 71% of death certificates, and renal disease in 75% of cases with renal replacement therapy. There was acceptable agreement between the committee, death certificates and ICD-codes only for deaths due to neoplasma, and between the committee and death certificates for deaths due to acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events and accidents. In only one out of four deaths due to hypoglycaemia and in four of seven deaths due to ketoacidosis was this diagnosis mentioned on the death certificate. No death due to hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis and 41% due to suicide were identifiable by ICD-codes.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Reliance on death certificates or ICD-codes as the only sources of information on the cause of specific mortality does not provide data of sufficient reliability for evaluation of clinical outcome in Type I diabetes.

摘要

目的/假设:比较临床评审委员会评估的死亡原因、死亡证明上提供的信息以及国家文献办公室提供的1型(胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病死者的国际疾病分类(ICD)编码。

方法

对3674例患者进行了10±3(平均±标准差)年的随访。记录了97%患者的生命状态和终末期糖尿病并发症;251例患者死亡。临床评审委员会对死亡原因进行了评估,并与死亡证明和ICD-9编码提供的信息进行了比较。

结果

评审委员会确定了94%病例的主要死亡原因,而73%的患者有死亡证明,79%的患者有ICD编码;10%的死亡证明因信息不足无法评估。71%的死亡证明提到了糖尿病,75%接受肾脏替代治疗的病例提到了肾脏疾病。仅在肿瘤导致的死亡方面,委员会、死亡证明和ICD编码之间存在可接受的一致性;在急性心肌梗死、脑血管事件和事故导致的死亡方面,委员会和死亡证明之间存在一致性。死亡证明上仅提及了四分之一低血糖死亡病例中的一例以及七例酮症酸中毒死亡病例中的四例。ICD编码无法识别任何低血糖或酮症酸中毒导致的死亡,以及41%自杀导致的死亡。

结论/解读:仅依靠死亡证明或ICD编码作为特定死亡率原因的唯一信息来源,无法为评估1型糖尿病的临床结局提供足够可靠的数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验