Gleichmann U
Z Kardiol. 2002;91 Suppl 4:86-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-002-1414-x.
Health policy has great influence on the daily work of every cardiologist. The influence of progress of practical cardiology on health policy in our country on the one hand and the influence of health policy on cardiology on the other hand are discussed, In the 1970s cardiac rehabilitation in special rehabilitation clinics was developed as a consequence of the usual therapy at that time with longer periods of bedrest and late invasive diagnostic procedures. Patients got a right on rehabilitation by law. However, in the 1980s the increasing number of rehabilitation clinics in our country and their budgets caused the first controversial discussion on health policy in our society, which was primarily thought to be a scientific one. At that time one of the first guidelines of the Commission of Clinical Cardiology as to coronary dilatation demanded in necessity of immediate cardiac surgery. To get more influence on the ongoing discussion the group of chief clinical cardiologists founded their own working group which had later on considerable influence on policy and scientific work of our society. Overall, the awareness of the need for active health policy was developed relatively late. For instance, the register of nationwide heart catheterization procedures was started in the early 1980s but was not used to influence health policies, for establishment of new catheterization facilities. At present, the development of cardiology is limited by budget and total number of cardiac operations is reduced, so it is time to remember the highly effective conservative "soft" therapy of atherosclerosis with a combination of drugs and changing lifestyle which is well evaluated in prospective studies. It is time to apply and reevaluate the chances of primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerosis and heart insufficiency. New non-invasive techniques as MRT and PET and therapeutic techniques as genetic or stem cell therapy will influence cost and health policy in the near future.
卫生政策对每位心脏病专家的日常工作都有很大影响。本文探讨了我国实用心脏病学的进展对卫生政策的影响以及卫生政策对心脏病学的影响。20世纪70年代,由于当时常规治疗采用较长时间的卧床休息和后期侵入性诊断程序,特殊康复诊所的心脏康复得以发展。患者依法享有康复权利。然而,在20世纪80年代,我国康复诊所数量及其预算的增加引发了社会上关于卫生政策的首次争议性讨论,当时主要认为这是一场学术讨论。当时,临床心脏病学委员会关于冠状动脉扩张的首批指南之一要求必须立即进行心脏手术。为了在正在进行的讨论中获得更大影响力,首席临床心脏病专家小组成立了自己的工作组,该工作组后来对我国社会的政策和科研工作产生了相当大的影响。总体而言,对积极卫生政策必要性的认识发展得相对较晚。例如,全国心脏导管插入术登记始于20世纪80年代初,但未被用于影响卫生政策以建立新的导管插入设施。目前,心脏病学的发展受到预算限制,心脏手术总数减少,因此是时候记住药物与改变生活方式相结合的治疗动脉粥样硬化的高效保守“软”疗法了,该疗法在前瞻性研究中得到了很好的评估。现在是时候应用并重新评估动脉粥样硬化和心力衰竭一级和二级预防的机会了。新的非侵入性技术如磁共振成像(MRT)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)以及治疗技术如基因或干细胞疗法将在不久的将来影响成本和卫生政策。