Arrangements for the management of urgent retinal detachments in the United Kingdom and Eire in the year 2000: results of a survey.

PURPOSE

To ascertain the current provision of facilities for the management of vitreo-retinal (V-R) emergencies, and attitudes of V-R surgeons towards the management of V-R emergencies within the United Kingdom and Eire.

METHODS

To obtain this information, all 82 consultant members of the Britain and Eire Association of Vitreo-Retinal Surgeons (BEAVRS) were requested to complete a 14-part postal questionnaire in the year 2000. Seventy-eight questionnaires were completed and returned. Data from the questionnaires were collated on a Microsoft Access Database and then statistically analysed using SPSS. The Student's t-test was used to assess relationships between continuous variables, and the Chi-squared and Fisher's Exact tests were used to compare non-parametric data. Analyses of the first 13 parts of the questionnaire are presented in this report.

RESULTS

The majority of V-R surgeons (59%) practise in teaching hospitals. There are greater numbers of V-R surgeons per unit in teaching hospitals as compared to District General Hospitals (DGHs). Ophthalmic theatre and ophthalmic theatre staff availability are theoretically high (92.3% and 84.6% respectively) and evenly distributed between teaching hospitals and DGHs, but in reality, access may be difficult. Most V-R surgeons take part in an on-call rota with general ophthalmology colleagues. This formal commitment may be infrequent. Only a small proportion of V-R surgeons (28.3%) officially provide a continuous fixed on-call V-R rota, though in practice, a larger proportion do seem to provide this type of cover informally. Most V-R fellows are located in teaching hospitals (89.5%), and are usually on either a formal or informal on-call rota. Only one unit has a formal continuous on-call rota for fellows allowing no more than 72 hours duty per week. The mean time given in response to the question as to the ideal time within which surgery of an acute macula on supero-temporal retinal detachment should be carried out was 29 hours. Most V-R surgeons would not support, in court, a colleague whose patient lost vision through delay in treating a macula on detachment.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this survey have important implications for providing a reliable service and for proper cover for doctors in training.