Pye J K
Department of Surgery, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Croesnewydd Road, Wrexham LL13 7TD, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Apr;90(3):193-7. doi: 10.1308/003588408X285766.
A survey was carried out to ascertain the current provision of general paediatric surgery (GPS) in all hospitals in England, Wales and Northern Ireland with 100% return rate. The provision of GPS is at a crossroads with a drift of these cases to the overstretched, tertiary referral hospitals.
The regional representatives on the council of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) obtained data from their regions. Any gaps in the data were completed by the author telephoning the remaining hospitals to ascertain their current provision.
A total of 325 acute hospitals are potentially available to admit elective and/or emergency paediatric patients, of which 25 hospitals provide a tertiary paediatric surgical service. Of the remaining 'non-tertiary' hospitals, 138 provide elective GPS and 147 provide emergency GPS. The ages at which GPS is carried out varies considerably, but 76% of non-tertiary hospitals provide elective GPS to those over the age of 2 years. The ages of emergency cases are 24% over the age of 2 years and 51.5% over the age of 5 years. The age at which surgery is carried out is dependent on the anaesthetic provision. Subspecialisation within each hospital has taken place with a limited number of surgeons providing the elective surgery. 'Hub-and-spoke' provision of GPS to a district general hospital (DGH) from a tertiary centre is embryonic with only 11 surgeons currently in post. An estimate of the annual elective case load of GPS based on the average number of cases done on an operation list works out at 23,000 cases done out with the tertiary centres.
Almost 10 years ago, a change in the training of young surgeons took place. An increase in training posts in Tertiary centres was made available following advice from the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) but these posts were often not taken up. Many DGH surgeons became uncertain whether they should continue GPS training. A subtle change in the wording of the general guidance by the Royal College of Anaesthetists altered the emphasis on the age at which it was appropriate to anaesthetise children. Change in clinical practice, reducing need, and a drift towards tertiary centres has reduced DGH operations by 30% over a decade. Young surgeons are now seldom exposed to this surgery, and are not being trained in it. The large volume of these low-risk operations in well children cannot be absorbed into the current tertiary centres due to pressure on beds. The future provision of this surgery is at risk unless action is taken now. This survey was carried out to inform the debate, and to make recommendations for the future. The principal recommendations are that: (i) GPS should continue to be provided as at present in those DGHs equipped to do so; (ii) GPS training should be carried out in the DGHs where a high volume of cases is carried out; (iii) management of these cases should use a network approach in each region; (iv) hospital trusts should actively advertise for an interest in GPS as a second subspecialty; and (v) the SAC in general surgery develop a strategy to make GPS relevant to trainee surgeons.
开展了一项调查,以确定英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰所有医院目前普通儿科手术(GPS)的提供情况,回复率达100%。普通儿科手术的提供正处于十字路口,这些病例正逐渐流向不堪重负的三级转诊医院。
大不列颠及爱尔兰外科医生协会(ASGBI)理事会的区域代表从其所在地区获取数据。作者通过电话联系其余医院以确定其目前的服务情况,从而填补数据中的任何空白。
共有325家急症医院有能力收治择期和/或急诊儿科患者,其中25家医院提供三级儿科手术服务。在其余的“非三级”医院中,138家提供择期普通儿科手术,147家提供急诊普通儿科手术。进行普通儿科手术的年龄差异很大,但76%的非三级医院为2岁以上儿童提供择期普通儿科手术。急诊病例中,24%为2岁以上,51.5%为5岁以上。手术年龄取决于麻醉服务的提供情况。每家医院都有亚专业划分,只有少数外科医生进行择期手术。从三级中心向地区综合医院(DGH)提供“轮辐式”普通儿科手术尚处于萌芽阶段,目前在职的外科医生只有11名。根据手术清单上的平均手术病例数估算,三级中心以外每年的择期普通儿科手术病例负荷约为23000例。
近10年前,年轻外科医生的培训发生了变化。根据英国儿科外科医生协会(BAPS)的建议,三级中心增加了培训岗位,但这些岗位往往无人应聘。许多地区综合医院的外科医生不确定自己是否应继续进行普通儿科手术培训。皇家麻醉师学院总体指导意见措辞的细微变化改变了对适合为儿童实施麻醉的年龄的强调重点。临床实践的变化、需求的减少以及向三级中心的转移,使得地区综合医院的手术量在十年间减少了30%。年轻外科医生现在很少接触这种手术,也没有接受这方面的培训。由于床位压力,目前的三级中心无法接纳大量健康儿童的低风险手术。除非现在采取行动,否则这种手术未来的提供将面临风险。开展这项调查是为了为相关辩论提供信息,并为未来提出建议。主要建议如下:(i)有能力开展普通儿科手术的地区综合医院应继续按目前方式提供服务;(ii)应在手术量较大的地区综合医院开展普通儿科手术培训;(iii)各地区应采用网络方法管理这些病例;(iv)医院信托应积极宣传对普通儿科手术作为第二亚专业的兴趣;(v)普通外科专科咨询委员会应制定一项战略,使普通儿科手术与实习外科医生相关。